Drilling into active magma


Drilling in Iceland lead by geologists from UC Davis hit magma this week. Image courtesy of Peter Schiffman, UC Davis.

Quick props to my officemate here at UC Davis, Naomi Marks, who happened to be part of a team (with UC Davis geology faculty Peter Schiffman and Robert Zierenberg) that drilled into active rhyolite magma in Iceland this week. Doesn't happen very often - this might be the third recorded time humans have drilled into magma - but when it does, it is very exciting. The magma was hit ~2 miles / 5 km below the surface and is likely an offshoot of a larger magmatic system nearby. The drilling was exploratory drilling as part of the Iceland Deep Drilling Project ... but this might mean that they can't drill in the hole anymore. Hey, you win some, you lose some, but note, no eruption in sight!

Congratulations to Naomi, Peter and Z.

More like this

Geologic and structural map showing the extent of the Campi Flegrei caldera on the north of the Bay of Naples, Italy. Image courtesy of INGV. One of the writing assignments I always enjoyed in high school was the "compare and contrast". You could sit back and look for stylistic differences between…
Eyjafjallajökull, an ice-capped volcano in Iceland that last erupted in 1823. We talked a few weeks ago of signs that there were increasing signs that an eruption could occur on Iceland - increased seismicity on the Reykjanes Ridge suggested that magma might be on the move. Now, we have two…
Here it is, my attempt to recap a year's worth of volcanic events. By no means is this supposed to capture every event, but rather the highlight/lowlights and what most captivated me during 2009. I'll be announcing the winner of the 2009 Pliny for Volcanic Event of the Year tomorrow. Waimangu…
Canlaon volcano, Philippines Geothermal energy is one of those sources of energy that might be able to solve a lot of the planet's energy problems - heck, the Earth has a lot of heat it is trying to get rid of, so taking that heat and turning into energy seems like an easy (and clean?) way to stop…

I'd like to know what really happens. Presumably the drill bit can handle the temperature, as presumably the temperature gardient is small enough that several meters before it was nearly as hot? If the stuff is viscous, and not under much pressure, I'd presume not too much. But, can you withdraw the drill bit intact? Or does it get too gummed up? Could you avoid hitting magma, by monitoring drillhole temperature, and stopping when it gets too high? If the magma was under pressure, is the combination of viscosity, and thermal conductivity high enough it would only squeeze up a little way, than harden -or could the result be more dramatic?

When drilling geothermal wells we need to pump cold drilling fluids down the borehole to keep the equipment functioning. The bottom hole temperatures while we're drilling, even into magma, is only about 30 degrees C. We can't tell how hot it is down there in the formation while drilling, and in fact formation temperatures can only be determined some months later after the well is equilibrated. But we've had a lot of trouble drilling this well, and there was certainly evidence that well was hot before we started getting explosions down-hole and recovering cuttings of quenched glass and crystal mush. The drill bit came up completely intact after being stuck for some hours, and when it was recovered, it had no glass attached to it, looked to be in good condition, and had only minor blackening on the outside of the bottom hole assembly.

@bigTom: No, the drill bit cannot withstand the temperature; when it gets too hot the physical properties change and the bit fails.

"Drill fluid" is continuously pumped as the drill operates - this serves to wash out the stuff being ground away and also keep the drill bit cool.

I don't know what sensors can be put into the drills (if any); you'd have to ask someone from the oil and gas industry. Personally I would have expected the drill fluid to increase in temperature rather dramatically as the magma was approached, but I'm only guessing.

At 5km depth, the magma will be under very high pressure - perhaps 30-40MPa. The stuff is rather viscuous though and I wouldn't even expect it to make it out of the drill hole; it will cool down and plug itself. These holes really aren't that large - for oil and gas we're looking at typical sizes of 10-15cm diameter and occasionally a bit larger than that.

I like the story about drilling which is alleged to have triggered a "mud eruption" in Indonesia. :) About a year ago at a conference, a number of groups got together and said that drilling caused the eruption; the company that was drilling vehemently denies it of course since that would make them liable for the damage caused. I find it rather amazing that mud is being pumped out; I can imagine water being pushed out under pressure as with an artesian well, but mud is really something. Perhaps there is an aquifer with extensive horizontal silty layers which have not cemented into rock and that's the stuff being washed out.

By MadScientist (not verified) on 26 Jun 2009 #permalink

Rhyolite magmas in Iceland? I thought Iceland was basaltic? Where do you get silicic magma in a spreading zone? Just curious...

Cheers,

N.

PS. Great blog BTW

Yes, there are temperature indicators you can put on the bit to determine temperature, but not until you've pulled the bit out of the well, nothing real-time. Also there are logging tools that are lowered down the well after the drill assembly is pulled out of the hole, but these are recording temps while cooling fluids are being pumped down-hole at a fairly high rate.
Also, there's plenty of rhyolite and granophyre in Iceland:) Obviously there's a lot more basalt though.

I am wondering if there have been any attempts to generate a
controlled flow of lava through a borehole for energy generation.
The pipes would need some sort of thermal insulation and/or pre-
heating to avoid solidification when the lava first flows through the relatively cool bore-hole, but presumably that can be achieved.
When the lava is sufficiently low in viscosity, one could
maintain a steady flow, which keeps the surroundings of the
bore-hole hot and prevents the lava from clogging to the walls.
I realize that its easier to extract energy from steam
than from sticky lava, but the large availability of lava near
the surface in some locations combined with the high energy release when solidifying could give it some potential. Any thoughts?.

By Jelle Boersma (not verified) on 08 Apr 2010 #permalink

In light of the discoveries of mega-volcanoes such as Yellowstone which is overdue to erupt, and Toba maybe it would be possible in the far future to create a controlled magma release preventing eruptions. Perhaps the Iceland experiments would be the forerunner of such controlled releases.

The closing paragraph tells it all in my opinion. I need to say that I agree with it, and the most great factor about it is that you left it open endedâ¦this reveals that you're prepared to attract in new and totally different opinions and that you're in the end very interested to see people getting concerned within the subject. So, any different opinions?

I'm still learning from you, while I'm trying to reach my goals. I definitely enjoy reading all that is written on your blog.Keep the stories coming. I liked it