Im not going to stop till you all are sick of Vpu.

Just in time for World AIDS day, the folks who discovered tetherin have a new paper out:
Broad-spectrum inhibition of retroviral and filoviral particle release by tetherin.

Just a quick summary-- Neil et al looked at the evolution of an HIV-1 protein, Vpu, and said 'something is going on here.' That 'something' turned out to be a previously unidentified component of your innate immune system. Rather than a physiological (skin) or cellular (macrophage) component, its kinda a chemical/protein component, like interferon gamma-- tetherin.

What happens, is that when a virus infects a cell (any cell! innate immunity!), the cell will start producing tetherin. Tetherin then locks progeny viruses to the cell surface, where they are taken up and 'digested' by the infected cell, rather than being released to infect new cells.

HIV-1s Vpu protein interferes with tetherin, so HIV-1 viruses can bud off successfully.

So this labs next question was: is tetherin specific for retroviruses? For lentiviruses? How does this thing work?

Evidently, tetherin is a broad-spectrum antiviral. In this new paper, Jouvenet et al stripped a whole cadre of viruses down to their core structural protein, gag. They had to strip them down to their most basic components, because for all we know, some viral protein with an 'unknown' function interferes with tetherin. So when these stripped-down viruses were put into cells that do NOT produce tetherin, the 'infected' cells released lots of viral like particles (VLPs-- empty shells of viruses).

When tetherin was added to the mix, VLP production stopped.

When HIV-1 Vpu was layered on top of all of this, VLP production resumed again.

This pattern emerged (at varying degrees) for:

  • HIV-1
  • SIV from Macaques
  • SIV from African Green Monkeys
  • Equine Infectious Anemia VIrus
  • Feline Immunodeficiency Virus
  • Rouse Sarcoma Virus (alpharetrovirus)
  • Mason Pfizer Monkey Virus (betaretrovirus)
  • Human Endogenous Retrovirus-K
  • Human T-Lymphotrophic Virus-1
  • Prototypic Foamy Virus (spumavirus- a weird kind of retrovirus)
  • Ebola
  • Marburg Virus (related to Ebola)

Tetherin doesnt care which virus its tethering. It lassos all those bastards.

Vpu doesnt care which virus its liberating (it just happens to come from HIV-1)-- it is focused on interfering with tetherin.

BUT all of those other viruses, when they arent stripped down to their structural proteins, can still infect cells (dir). They must encode their own way of evading tetherin (the SIVs envelope protein can!). Figuring out their respective tricks = New antiviral pharmaceuticals. I dunno about you all, but a drug that could stop Ebola in its tracks sounds pretty damn awesome.

And, what I would LOVE LOVE LOVE to see from this lab, is for them to take Vpu from the 1959 and 1960 HIV-1 isolates, and see how they compare to modern Vpu in their ability to interact with tetherin. *giddy clapping* They already used the HERV-K 'phoenix' virus-- they know how to work with zombie viruses! DO IT guys!!


More like this

This is a repost from the old ERV. A retrotransposed ERV :P I dont trust them staying up at Blogger, and the SEED overlords are letting me have 4 reposts a week, so Im gonna take advantage of that! I am going to try to add more comments to these posts for the old readers-- Think of these as '…
Two things I didnt intend on writing about on ERV more than a few times, but turned into repeat guests: XMRV and Vpu. Theyve finally come together. Susceptibility of xenotropic murine leukemia virus-related virus (XMRV) to retroviral restriction factors Know how I was talking about intrinsic…
While we are on the topic of IDiot Michael Behe, I thought now would be a good time to check in on our dear friend, HIV-1 Vpu! What neat evolutionary tales do you have for us this week, HIV-1 Vpu? Vpu directs the degradation of the human immunodeficiency virus restriction factor BST-2/Tetherin via…
So almost exactly a year ago, Michael 'LiLo' Behe released his prized pig book, 'Edge of Evolution', where he stated, with utmost certainty, that HIV-1 'has not evolved'. Yeah, that hasnt worked out too well for him. Anyway, unlike Ivory Handed Creationists who dont lower themselves to doing…

Just to reiterate, this is where Dembski and the ID guys have argued at length that there's nothing interesting in the evolution of HIV, right?


By Stephen Wells (not verified) on 01 Dec 2008 #permalink

have you just been busy,or do you have a boyfriend now LOL ? That was a long silence there....

Like the virology posts tho,keep it up..:-)

If you haven't already, you should contact them directly and propose your zombie virus rule the world! :)

Can't we make exogenous vpu-like substance that would bind with tetherin and would render original vpu from binding and interfering? Kind of like an antagonist.

So do the know the shape of tetherin. Do they have of those fancy bioinformatic protein graphics for it? Or is it too early?