HIV and Charlie Sheen

ERV-->TMZ?

No, this is an education and outreach opportunity, and I want to use it to the best of my ability as an HIV researcher.

1-- I am so glad Charlie Sheen got tested for HIV. Most people who should be, dont, because even faced with a treatable, deadly disease, denial is *incredibly* attractive. 'If I dont know, then it cant be real' is a tall hurdle *many* of us will have to clear for some reason, at some point in our lives. Sheen got tested, and that is the first step to stopping HIV.

2-- "I have to... I have to. I am here to admit, in fact, I am HIV positive."

*wince*

'Coming out' is obviously very difficult for Sheen, and not something he felt comfortable doing. Sheen was forced out-- I have also heard rumors he was paying people to keep this information private. Complete and utter bullshit. Sheen doesnt owe the general public knowledge about his medical heath. It is fine if someone wants to be a celebrity voice for <insert any disease/cause/whatever>, but someones HIV status is literally no one elses business except the people they are having sex with.

Forcing someone out like this, in 2015, is deplorable.

3-- There has been some suggestion that the 'reason' people forced him out, was that Sheen was not open with all of his sexual partners. Sheen says "... threatening the health of so many others, which couldnt be farther from the truth." But both statements could be true. HIV+ individuals on antiretroviral therapy, who have low/undetectable viral loads, who use condoms, their partners are at low risk of becoming infected. But it is the *partners* decision whether the risk, however negligible, is acceptable. Not telling someone, and making the executive decision about risk for them, is 100% unacceptable. While there is argument over whether this should be criminal, or not, I am of the opinion that if you are HIV positive, it is not your decision to declare your partner is not at risk. Educate yourself, educate your partner, and make these decisions together.

 

 

I cant believe after all the progress society has made on HIV/AIDS in the past few decades celebrities have to 'admit' they have HIV to Matt Lauer.

Use condoms. Get tested. Educate yourself. Educate your partner. Encourage your politicians to get everyone who is HIV+ access to proper medications. And unless you are sleeping with a celebrity, their HIV status is none of your damn business.

 

More like this

HIV-- Its a terrible game of chance. Odds of HIV transmission are, superficially, rather low (its no measles). And, we can make the risk of transmission even lower various pro-active ways-- antiretroviral use to keep viral loads down in HIV+ people (especially in pregnant women about to give birth…
As promised, a discussion on the paper, Heterosexual transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in northern California: results from a ten-year study. First, let's backtrack a bit and see what's already been said, lest I repeat myself. The little summary below can also catch anyone up…
When someone is dying, you treat what is killing them first. This might seem obvious, but its not-- People wondered 'If we can cure people of HIV with bone marrow transplants, then why dont we give everyone bone marrow transplants??' We can only give HIV+ people with blood cancers that are killing…
Reposted from the old TfK. Two recent comments on the 25th anniversary of AIDS took up a similar call, one in the New England Journal of Medicine, the other from Scienceblogger Tara Smith. Both essentially argue for the broadening of HIV testing in American society. The NEJM piece largely recycles…

Also: use clean needles, be very picky about your tattoo artist and piercers, try to avoid being in an altered mental stated while engaging in any of the listed activities.

I'm not interested in celebrities medical information (or really any information), but I hope that for people who are interested in celebrities, this creates opportunities for conversations about safe sex and HIV.

By JustaTech (not verified) on 17 Nov 2015 #permalink

Hi Abbie, Do you have an email address. I have a few questions.
Enjoy your blog, as always.

By Anon for now. (not verified) on 09 Dec 2015 #permalink

Yup! Im terrible about getting to emails these days, but its endogenousretrovirus at gmail :)

A pandemic worse than HIV is coursing though the population. A retrovirus being pumped through the vaccine needles of unsuspecting population. And only Mikovits has discovered the true nature of this pandemic an hgrv, mlv retrovirus. The biggest cover-up of all.

http://powerpointparadise.com/blog/2015/12/25798/

You DO know how crazy you sound there, right?

"HIV+ individuals on antiretroviral therapy, who have low/undetectable viral loads, who use condoms, their partners are at low risk of becoming infected."

How come? What is the risk?

By Richard E. (not verified) on 28 Jan 2016 #permalink