-
Who knew Casey Luskin would swipe an icon an represent himself as living up to a standard he was clearly dodging? (Anyone who's been paying attention, of course.)
-
The Bloggers for Peer-Reviewed Research Reporting community weighs in as to whether Casey Luskin (who lifted the BPR3 icon) followed their guidelines.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Bloggers for Peer-Reviewed Research Reporting has announced a contest to design an icon to identify serious blog posts discussing peer-reviewed research.
Anyone will be able to use the icon on their blog posts whenever the post is a serious commentary about a paper published in a peer-reviewed…
Over at BPR3, a reader brought up an interesting question about the nature of peer-reviewed research, which I thought was relevant to our readers here as well. I'm reposting my entire response below.
The system of peer review, the bulwark of academic publishing, has served scholars for centuries.…
Casey Luskin has a post up over at the Discovery Institute's website that discusses an article that was recently published in PLoS Biology. The post itself is nothing particularly remarkable - Casey takes a paper that says that current hypotheses don't adequately deal with all of the problems of…
You may have been following the saga of intelligent design proponent Casey Luskin's use of the ResearchBlogging.org "Blogging on Peer-Reviewed Research" icon in a way that didn't conform to the official guidelines for its use.
The short description on ResearchBlogging's mission says:
Research…