RNA, RNA Everywhere, Does It Do Anything?

Alex has been pondering the nature of non-protein-coding RNAs. So have the boys at Gene Expression (how appropriate). Coffee Mug and JP have pointed out that a large portion of the human genome is transcribed, and much of it has an unknown function. Now JP describes a paper that takes an evolutionary approach towards studying the function of intergenic transcripts. By comparing human and chimp transcription profiles, the authors "that intergenic transcripts show patterns of tissue-specific conservation of their expression which are comparable to exonic transcripts of known genes." This provides evidence of functional constraints on intergenic transcripts, which means that many of the intergenic transcripts are probably not transcriptional mistakes (or errors in identifying transcripts).

More like this

Two big studies on genetics came out in the past couple weeks, and I want to talk about both. One of them -- the ENCODE study -- was well covered by the media. The other seems to have slipped through. Paper #1: In the ENCODE study, the authors compiled data using a variety of experimental…
One of the greatest developments of the post-genomic era has been the refinement of the concept of the 'gene'. The central dogma states that genes encode RNA transcripts which are translated into the amino acid sequence that makes up a protein. But protein coding genes make up a small fraction of…
I finally read the huge Nature paper that everyone has been talking about, the ENCODE project, or the encyclopedia of DNA Elements. ENCODE is a large scale concerted effort whose goal is to understand how the genome is used, maintained and conserved. In other words, what parts of the genome get…
You know that organisms develop, grow, and function in part because genes code for proteins that form the building blocks of life or that function as working bioactive molecules (like enzymes). You also know that most DNA is junk, only a couple percent actually coding for anything useful. Most…