Doc Bushwell Joins the Anti-omics Brigade

Dr. Joan Bushwell (not her real name) has hurled some poo at the -omicists. You know, those people who attach -omics to everything and act like they've come up with a brand new research discipline. I imagine them making the "guitar player changing chords" face (go to 1:09 in this video) when they coin a new "ome".

As one last hurrah for omeomics, Doc Bushwell coined the meme-ome. That would be a collection of all the memes floating around the blogosphere. Or is it all memes everywhere? Who knows? But it is the perfect congruence of two terms that have worn out there welcome.

And systems biologists, don't think you're immune from the criticism. We all know you're just computer scientists who think they've invented physiology.

P.S. I posted this in the Philosophy of Science category because, well, I can.

More like this

Browsing through the reviews section of the current issue of Antiquity, I came across a confusing and irritating piece (behind a paywall) by one Dr. Charlotte Whiting. She works for the Council for British research in the Levant and is based in Amman in Jordan. Her review article treats three…
By now, you're probably aware of the Rightful Place Project, which is collecting text, images, audio, and video from scientists, engineers, and others involved in conversations about science in response to the question, What is science's rightful place? I'm still thinking about my own response to…
So, Janet posed the meme (or something with the same name) to enable us newbies to introduce ourselves. And because I'm a follower, not a leader, I have to offer up my predilections to you all. 3 reasons you blog about science: 1. Because it's interesting, dammit! 2. Because science is the…
Sandy has declared her love for all things "-omics". She even came up with a nifty table to define a bunch of omes. It's like she's created a list-o-omes-eome. Snark aside, here's why she likes omes: I like "ome" [see, I told you she would tell us why she likes omes] because it simultaneously…


And systems biologists, don't think you're immune from the criticism. We all know you're just computer scientists who think they've invented physiology.

I'm glad I'm not the only one who feels this way sometimes about systems biology...

Somebody needs to write up all the "-omics" topics into a book, so I can add it to my bibliome.

I imagine them making the "guitar player changing chords" face (go to 1:09 in this video) when they coin a new "ome".

Oh, that's an excellent illustration! Another winceworthy term is chemogenomics, coined by some former colleagues. They were tumescent for days after coming up with that one.

Actually, I think an AI guy named Doug Lenat (and possibly some random Discordian as well) gets credit for the word "memome". It does sound rather silly though.

In 1994-5, when there were less than 100 bioinformatists in th world(really!), we have felt that bioinformatics, proteomics, transcriptomics etc were too much and felt it was only for self-serving ego and taking another piece of research fund.
In 1998, when I first had 'systems biology' seminar in UK, I thought, it was exactly what I was doing: bioinformatics.
I now think omics is useful in many places. If we object to omics, we should object to many words such as nano-xx, etc. We are in systems/commplexity era.