Does anybody have FrameMaker installed?

I need some old files converted to RTF. You get a Special Award...

More like this

Having disagreed (somewhat) with Tobias Buckell in the previous post, let me follow that up with something positive: He's got a new book, Ragamuffin coming out soon, and he's putting excerpts up on the official Ragamuffin page. You can get RTF files of the first two chapters, and he's promised a…
Want to publish something? Worried that you don't actually have a lab or an opportunity to do real research? Never fear, the Institute for Creation Research has put out a call for papers, and anyone can get published there! (Well, just about anyone. I doubt that anything I submitted under my name…
The long awaited results... Best New Discovery/Research (Heights of the Abyss Award): When it's the deep sea its all new. 2007 was no different with more big discoveries and novel research than you can shake a stick at. The Judges! were more indecisive than the Democratic party on what to do…
After a frantic couple of weeks, the lab seems to be finally coming together. This afternoon I sat down and started to peruse the past few issues of Cell Science, Nature, JCB, PLoS etc. and a few of the blogs that I like to check out. And then I read this strange article in the latest issue of…

Alas, my work emvironment was assimilated by the Borg a few years back. Instead of the intuitive, cooperative, versatile Frame (which I had been using for 10 years, including my Masters dissertation), I now have to struggle daily with clunky, bloated MS-Word, which continually seems to think (wrongly!) that it knows what I'm trying to do, and in which finding out how to do what I really want requires navigation of the largely useless Help system, and/or random mousing through endless menus and forms.

By Steve Watson (not verified) on 13 Oct 2006 #permalink

I did my masters in Frame as well, along with doing university handbooks and various policy manuals. What gets me is that back in 1986 I could place graphics in Frame and have them stay where I put them, so cross references and indices with ease, and apply all kinds of useful styles. Word stillc an't do any of these things. And the final version, 6, had sideheads and the best table editor out there. And it saved HTML, PDF, and XML. Then Adobe bought it, and that was the end for Mac OS. And there's nothing to replace it.

If Endnote's functionality was fully available in other word processors (as it once was for Frame, via MIF), I'd have no Microsoft products on my hard disk at all.

John, and others,
If any of you find anything that will work on OS X, with Endnote or another similar program, (that can search the ISI network and all that) without having to use Word or any MS program, the community will be eternally gratefull for your spreading of that information.

Have any of you played with Pages? Aside from the Endnote problem, is it a useful product? Are there any open source (i.e. X11-type) solutions aside from OpenOffice that are useful?

I'm not familiar with Frame, but is it OS X compatible? (There is no OS 9 on my new Mac, nor can it even run it.) What are the advantages? I had a hell of a time with Word on my own thesis. Thank goodness I was able to use the electronic (PDF) submission process. Macs make that part very easy.

Yours hopefully,
Mike

I'm still looking. TeX (LaTeX and OzTeX and the like) are pretty good, and there is BibTeX for references, but they lack the ease of EndNote, and there's a major learning curve. I like OpenOffice (I use NeoOffice, which is a Java port that uses the Mac interface) but to use Endnote, you need to export to RTF and that format is problematic.

Pages is still pretty limited, and has a massive memory footprint. One day it might be useful.

Frame is not OS X. Adobe orphaned it for Mac when they bought it. Back in the day, it had no peer.