For those who wish a copy of Gosse's famous Omphalos, I have uploaded it to Internet Archive. It's still only a PDF, but I hope that the IA folks will do an OCR.
Many thanks to Noelie Alito for buying me the copy. Now that it's scanned, I'll have it rebound, one day.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Its is here. It's a largish PDF, about 81Mb, and this is only a temporary site until I get the proper files to Archive.Org for assembly and OCR.
Philip Henry Gosse was a well-known naturalist in the early 19th century. Huxley referred to him as "that honest hodman of science", and he was…
A mammoth as restored in Gosse's Omphalos. In Gosse's view of history, however, such a scene never actually existed. The bones of the mammoth existed in the earth from the time of Creation and had never given form to a living animal.
Without a doubt, Philip Henry Gosse's Omphalos is one of the…
Traveling and busy as hell, but wanted to share this. The ever expanding copyright laws is one of my pet peeves, but almost as irritating as the increasing length of copyright is the difficulty in knowing if something is still under copyright. The copyright date and name of the copyright holder in…
It can really be a chore to track down old papers. While many journals have digitized their collections and placed them online, a subscription is often required to access old papers (even from the 19th century!)*. That's if the paper you're looking for was published in a journal that still exists,…
I tried to do an OCR with Acrobat but I got an error message that it couldn't do it because the resolution was below the minimum of 144 dpi.
Gosse wrote on p. 3,
Well, this principle that Gosse suggests exists in my estimation and it would not only modify the conclusions of scientists but would greatly modify their efforts at controlling nature.
Presently, students are not taught in schools what they need to know. Instead, as a result of prejudice or perhaps sexual bias, a book by a woman: Madame Blavatsky, was shoved under a rug - ONLY IT WILL RESURFACE because human values dictate that even women receive a fair share of the work.
The book: THE SECRET DOCTRINE was published in 1888, after this work by Gosse and after Darwin's thesis was published.
As Gosse and Darwin were first, perhaps it is fair that their works should be digested first - pristinely, but THE SECRET DOCTRINE contains a theory of evolution discovered by and based upon the senses of a woman.
When women received equal standing in 1920, the book should have been resurrected, however men being proud as they are continued on their course of giving it no notice.
Within this book a theory of evolution, also described on my webpage, was presented, but children go to school today without hearing this theory.
If there is contact between these two kingdoms of nature: the human and the girasas, then we want to know. We want people to tell us about the work that has been done, so that if we choose to, we may advance the study by our own additional work.
Unfortunately, from my understanding, if the girasas kingdom begins to speak (through what I had always considered my own mouth, mind you), then it might result in the human kingdom losing the ability to speak. You ask for proof, and yet who is willing to ask another individual to go to this length, forfeiting their own rights and life processes so that they may show you the existence of a higher kingdom within themselves?
If people only knew what they asked for, wouldn't they be gentler and kinder regarding the standards and accept written words or visual images, anything rather than the girasas showing themselves through the human without fail.
Within THE SECRET DOCTRINE, we are told that we as humans only began to speak and use language during the third root race, but certainly there were inner communications that could be made somehow before speech came into use so that animals could be directed and guided by the human force working within the limitations of the animal to alter those limitations into a form conducive to human life.
My Acrobat (3D ver 8) didn't give an error message and did identify some words, not many though.
I am now trying to clean up the image by making it single page sequential (one book page per Acrobat page) and this seemed to help.
Presently trimming off the dirty edges (slow and tedious job) and then I'll try again.
Even if it doesn't work, trimming off the edges has made the file smaller and it is easier to read.
Not sure what to do with all the pictures though.
Should I export them seperately to bmps and then paste into the text if the OCR and conversion works?