How undergraduates see philosophy

I am quite sure that this is how undergraduates in philosophy see the whole thing:

HT: Creative Synthesis

More like this

I am a lucky author. Anyone who writes a book hopes to avoid the fate that David Hume famously ascribed to his Treatise of Human Nature, which he said ''fell dead-born from the press, without reaching such distinction, as even to excite a murmur among the zealots.'' I certainly have managed to…
Just in case you thought you were having a good day, here is a href="http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/BOGNONBR?cid=123">graph from the Fed that shows how much money the banks have: Don't panic.  The final number is from 1 July 2008.  I'm sure they've fixed the problem by now. HT…
Sun Microsystems is href="http://www.techworld.com/green-it/news/index.cfm?newsID=10667">planning to put a data center in an old coal mine.  The idea is to save on energy costs.  In fact, they expect nine million dollars per year on electricity.  This is because much of the electrical…
One of the embarrassing things about Michigan Politics is that many of the national politicians, while generally fairly progressive, do not get on board with mandates for cars that pollute less.   The auto makers argue that it would take too long to develop the technology to meet higher fuel…

That's it. I'm becoming a radical skeptic. There's nothing we can know or do. :)

By Brian English (not verified) on 04 Feb 2008 #permalink

AHAHAHA!!! that is classic. i love it. I get it all! I received my Master's in computer science, but always had a fondness for Phil classes. This is just perfect.

I like it!

I seem to recall, vaguely, a lengthy all-text example along that line. Something about brains in jars on moving trains, perhaps ...? I can't seem to find a link to it now. (I didn't know there would be a quiz!) Oh, well, I should get back to work in the chinese room.

Gee, unlike Dennett's list of philosophical neologisms, I actually understood most of the references. Perhaps there's hope for me yet....

I am quite sure that this is how undergraduates in philosophy see the whole thing:

Wots undergrads got tuh do with it!

This is wot filosofi is about ain it?

Well I didn't want to criticise academics who aren't philosophers, but that is how a lot of them see it, too.

This is the most awesome comic I've seen in the last year.

By Sophie Hirschfeld (not verified) on 05 Feb 2008 #permalink

I didn't want to criticise academics who aren't philosophers,

Aren't all academics philosophers? Or don't they, at least, think they have the right, as academics, to philosophize?

Aren't all academics philosophers? Or don't they, at least, think they have the right, as academics, to philosophize?

Yes.They just don't think that their philosophizing is philosophizing.

This is an especially common attitude amongst academics in the natural sciences.

Highly amusing.

I sincerely wish that my undergrad philosophy profs had been nearly that clever.

Rt

By Roadtripper (not verified) on 06 Feb 2008 #permalink

"Philosophy" is probably something that anyone with any intelligence has a natural inclination to engage in. And everyone thinks they're an expert. Kinda like politics. Forget Searle and Hauser - maybe there's even a philosophy gene ;) I haven't checked - is philosophy defined in the basic concepts list? Might be interesting.

I kinda remember this -- those shadows on the wall of the cave were explaining the length of the flagpole, iirc, but I just don't remember where the flagpole was with respect to the train tracks!

This is a masterpiece. Thanks for sharing it. Though it is deplorable they left the "brain in a vat" issue.
The comics did put my brain on fire. (Now, where did I put that vat...)