... has it still happened? Anyway, the BBC, bless 'em, has had philosopher David Bain pose four philosophical questions to mark the epistemologically problematic day:
1. Should we kill healthy people for their organs?
2. Are you the same person who started reading this article?
3. Is that really a computer screen in front of you?
4. Did you really choose to read this article?
Or in more traditional terms: Utilitarian ethics, personal identity, perception and illusion, and free will and determinism. Sneaky. Get 'em in with a condundrum and then pervert the minds of those who stay to consider. Classic Socratic corruption of the youth. Well played, that man.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Do we have free will? While some may see the question as trivial, it's a challenging topic that has been actively debated for centuries. Whether or not you believe a god is involved, a case can be made that free will is simply an illusion, and that every "decision" we make is completely controlled…
Ronald Bailey at Reason reviews an interesting article in the American Journal of Bioethics by Martha Farah and Andrea Heberlein and the responses to it. Farah and Heberlein argue that while an innate system for the detection of personhood exists in the human brain, it is so prone to being fooled…
Janet D. Stemwedel: Hey, can we talk about pseudonymous blogging?
Dr. Free-Ride: Haven't you already written a bunch of posts about that?
Janet D. Stemwedel: Yeah, but the blogosphere seems to be discussing it again.
Dr. Free-Ride: You know I only work on Fridays, right?
Janet D. Stemwedel: Get…
Dan Solove brings up some privacy issues with using sitemeter on blogs:
But Site Meter also lists the IP address of each visitor, something that the public really doesn't need to see. An IP address is a unique numerical identifier that is assigned to every computer connected to the Web. It doesn't…
Did a little round-up of a news article and some links - but then, Queenslanders are usually on the ball regarding Philosophy in Schools. :)
http://podblack.com/?p=1062
Hmm...
1. No
2. Yes
3. Yes
4. Yes
And BTW, the number of angels that can dance on the head of a pin is 28. I counted.
Did you count the real angels, or just the integers? I make it 33.673991 angels.
No
Yes and No
Who cares?
No.
Feel free to use these as your answer key.
1. It is an illusion to think that one can kill anybody
2. Do people really exist?
3. What's real?
4. See 3!
It is an illusion to believe that pins have heads!
Come,come, John! you make it approximately 33.673991 angels.
What most people don't realize is that the number of angels that can dance on the head of a pin depends not on the angels but the style of dance the are doing. If they are doing dances that allow a large number to crowd into a small space like ballroom or line-dancing then you can get upwards of 40 on the head of a pin. On the other hand, there are dances that need a lot more space so you might only get 10 jitterbugging or breakdancing angels on the same pinhead.
The wings get in the way, too.
1. No, not for organs but yes for a Fender Stratocaster.
2. Define person
3. Is this a monitor which I see before me,
The mouse toward my hand? Come, let me click thee.
I link thee not, and yet I see thee still.
Art thou not, fatal Vista, sensible
To keyboard as to mouse? or art thou but
A Window of the mind, a false creation,
Proceeding from the pride-oppressed Gates?
I see thee yet, in form as palpable
As this which now I Corel draw.
4. No, I just pretended.