HOW BELIEVABLE WAS BUSH'S IRAQ SPEECH? Watch How Focus Groups Rated the Speech in Real Time

What was the impact of Bush's Iraq speech? Howard Kurtz of the Washington Post has an excellent round up of media and pundit reaction to the president's primetime TV appearance. Meanwhile, ABC News and CBS News have posted revealing results from overnight polls.

Yet the most entertaining, if not the least scientifically valid guage of public response comes by way of Slate magazine. The online commentary site partnered with HCD Research, a market-research company, in a project to investigate "real time" viewer reaction to Bush's Tuesday night speech. HCD surveys people over the Internet by allowing participants to rate a video as they watch it on their computers; they then display the results on a graph as the video plays.

HCD gathered key excerpts from the president's speech, and then played them for a group of 435 Democrats, Republicans, and independents. Participants were asked to rate the believability of what President Bush was saying at any given moment on a sliding scale that ranges from +100 to -100. Each colored graph represents the average of the responses from everyone of that party affiliation. Go to the Slate site to watch the clip and dial reactions

More like this

In response to my post yesterday which argued that Democrats and Republicans are both vulnerable to what's politely referred to as "motivated reasoning" - in other words, we're all partisan hacks - some commenters objected. They pointed out that the actual study I was discussing found that…
The Jargon Dictionary says: spelling flame: n. [Usenet] A posting ostentatiously correcting a previous article's spelling as a way of casting scorn on the point the article was trying to make, instead of actually responding to that point (compare dictionary flame). Of course, people who are more…
Matt Yglesias makes an important psychological point about political debates: My read of what I see in these debates is so heavily colored by ex ante beliefs and information that it's hard for the debate to change anything. During the first 100 days question, for example, John Edwards gave his…
As I wrote last week, in John McCain's recent television ad focusing on global warming, he frames his position as a pragmatic "middle way" approach between the two extremes of denying there is a problem and resorting to heavy taxation and regulation. The ad even ends by offering up the…