And god was angry with his creation!

I just found out that a 19th century geologist, John Phillips, was so struck by discontinuities in the stratigraphy of fossil depositions that he believed there had been multiple Creations. What Phillips was seeing were the mass extinctions, like the Permian event, which resulted in an elimination of most genera and a subsequent radiation of new forms. I wonder how Gottfried Leibniz would reconcile this evidence of god's caprice with his assertion that we lived in the best of all worlds. In reference to a previous post where I made a distinction between what people say they believe vs. what they really believe, I think the lack of perturbation of many traditional Creationist theists to issues like mass extinction is a clue to the workings of the mental engine under the hood. While on the surface there are explanations for why an omniscient, omnibenevolent and omnipotent supernatural being would engage in "rought drafts" or allow the perpetuation of functional inefficiencies due to what seem like phylogenetic historical relationships, the reality is that such a creative agent can't be encompassed by the human mind. The real conception is more prosaic, a limited being of great powers in whom fallibility and mistake is possible. Kind of like an alien in fact.

More like this

The problem of evil has become a topic of discussion again. I don't think I've blogged about theodicy in any depth since 2006, so I guess it's time to take it up again. In brief, the problem of evil is classically posed as a question of why evil should exist in the world if there is an omnipotent…
Folks are talking about the problem of evil. John Wilkins takes on the problem of the problem of evil and Darwin, arguing that, for theologies where the problem of evil is a problem, evolution probably does less to exacerbate the issue than basic physics, or physiology, or first principles of…
At first glance, I thought this book was too slim to accomplish its stated goal, but I was wrong. In God: The Failed Hypothesis (Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 2007), Victor J. Stenger critically examines both empirical data and scientific models for the existence of a supreme, transcendant being…
My last post has provoked a few replies. Especially the part about the problem of evil. In my review of the new book by Giberson and Collins I was critical of their treatment of the problem. Michael Ruse, always classy, opens his response thusly: Given that they are both committed Christians,…

Louis Agassiz also held to his own variant of 'multiple creations' in opposition to Darwinism, and for similar reasons.

I'm surprised that god would create something that he'd ever grow angry with. That god wanted to wipe the slate clean a few times isn't a particularly convincing case for his omnipotence.