Real Clear Politics has a column titled The Secular Right which reflects upon the Mac Donald vs. God affair. Interestingly, the author linked to my post where I followed the debate in The Corner. A few months ago my summary of John Derbyshire's summary of Judith Rich Harris' work was linked from her site. Ultimately, I think this should be a clue to NRO that they need to invest in a more robust and user friendly content management system: their archiving blows.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Over at The Corner at National Review Online John Derbyshire has been getting into a debate with his colleagues over Judith Rich Harris' work, and her two books The Nurture Assumption and No Two Alike. I find it amusing when scientific controversy comes crashing into the punditocracy, though I…
David Brooks has a new column grandly titled The End of Philosophy. Heather Mac Donald at Secular Right chides him for his criticism of the New Atheists, while John Derbyshire offers guarded praise. It seems to me that the jab at the New Atheists was something of a throwaway line and I lean more…
Joomla! is a Content Management System that is so widely used and cool that you can buy Joomla logo gear, like this shirt. Could that mean that it is a good CMS? And why would you want one?
Before I started Gregladen.com, I went through all of the content management sites that I had available…
The identity politics wrapped up in author Sam Harris' statements at a recent atheist conference here in Washington, DC has sparked a ton of discussion and debate. Paul Kurtz, chair of the Center for Inquiry and Editor of Free Inquiry, has circulated an important response via various email lists.…
I put all my money on Mac Donald. That God fellow has a nasty habit of not showing up.
From the RCP article:
That's rather out of date. The definition of "skepticism" has shifted. What he describes would now be called "universal skepticism" or "Pyrrhonism". In modern, or scientific, skepticism, doubt is not universal. Belief is apportioned according to the evidence.
After that, he proceeds to some rather laughable strawmen. It's interesting to see him attack PoMo and Relativism as Leftist values, considering these have in recent years been embraced by some members of the Right ( Astroturf campaigns, David Horowitz's Academic Bill of Rights, the "Republican war on science")
Except that Natural Law has never overcome the very simple criticism directed at it: Is vs. Ought? Mac Donald is correct, reason-based morality has no need to rely on Natural Law.
Oh joy. I've reached the bottom of the column and discovered he's a Rand-ian.
Oh joy. I've reached the bottom of the column and discovered he's a Rand-ian.
bingo :=)