The problem with the "ladies"

Do you remember the famous saying by which began Martin Niemöller "First they came for the Jews...." The moral is that evil targets the weak and the vulnerable and works its way up the food chain. By safeguarding the rights of the weakest of us we safeguard all our rights. By humanizing the least of us we reaffirm what makes humanity precious.

This week there has been talk of banning women from praying near the Kaaba. I am not a believer, but I can see how religious women would become upset by this exclusion. The rationale was simple: there was overcrowding which was causing a public safety problem, and excluding women would ameliorate that issue. Note that the exclusion of women was not something sanctified by some explicit and conscious diminishment of women from their equality before god, rather, it was an offhand, almost banal, expression of the way that many Muslim men view women. It reminded me of a woman at my mosque as a child who complained that all the women were being moved to the basement for prayers. Why? Because the main prayer hall was overcrowded. It reminds me of a conversation that my aunt once had with my uncle, she joked offhand asking why men should always pray before women. My uncle, a religious man, explained that if women prayed before men in the hall then when they bent over and prostrated themselves they would expose themselves to men. That would be improper. My aunt responded, "Ah, but it's fine if we see your backsides all the time?" My uncle was so taken aback that he didn't respond. On another occassion my mother explained to some friends (non-Muslim) that purdah, the veiled and covered state you sometimes see Muslim women in (i.e., "black moving objects") is virtuous, because "only their husbands can see their beauty, it is for no one else." Her friends laughed and responded, "Ah, but women can always look through the veil to see the men!" This is a common joke.

My point with these anecdotes is to highlight the fundamental depth of the problem between men and women in much of the world, and in particular (though not exclusive to) the Islamic world. The problem is not the men just view women as things, rather, it is that they often also view them as nothings. Excluding women from prayer halls is expedient and convenient. Women cover themselves up so that they are "for His eyes only," but men walk about in relative freedom, their faces naked to the world, are they not comely as well? Ah, but the lust induced in women is nothing.

Tags

More like this

Razib at Gene Expression talks about a recent episode where women were to be banned from praying in a Mecca Shrine. a conversation that my aunt once had with my uncle, she joked offhand asking why men should always pray before women. My uncle, a religious man, explained that if women prayed before…
The Washington Post has a fun profile of Sam Harris. This part cracked me up: "If the Koran were exactly the same," he said, toward the end of the night, "and there were just one line added to it, and the line said, 'If you see a red-haired woman on your lawn at sunset, kill her,' I can tell you…
The Campaign to free the Tripoli Six is entering a new and dangerous phase. On October 31 their trial resumes, with a death sentence again looming. For those not familiar with the case, The New York Times today summarized the situation in a strongly worded editorial: Five Bulgarian nurses and a…
When it comes to discussing suicide bombers, the controversial topic of religion is never far behind. Scholars and pundits have proposed several theories to explain why people would sacrifice their lives to take those of others, and conjectures about religious views seem easy to defend. After all,…

This interesting cultural difference highlights a Western feeling: that to be fully human is to be public. Americans take this to absurd extremes with celebrity worship, but it underlies the deep recoil at the idea of making 1/2 of society non-public. To be only private is to lack dignity, lack the chance to be on American Idol.

The Western desire for fame goes along with the Western tension between the freedom of anonymity (of a degree rare in the developing world) and the distress of isolation. This goes along with the relatively weak family structure and community structure compared to, say, the Muslim world.

On a very different note: the Western 20th century idea of desexualizing women as "un-free" is pretty idiosyncratic. Are confirmed bachelorettes who spend hours a day trying to look sexy for passerby or casual dating partners "free"? Or are they slaves to sexuality - not their own, but the sexual enjoyment of the bachelors who enjoy them without obligation? Is that really "women's lib"?

"Black moving objects": a friend of mine worked as a tech in Qatar for a year or two. One time he was in a store and needed to set something down, so he set it on a nearby piece of furniture. The piece of furniture was a very short, fully covered woman.

Razib,

Since you know more about Islamic law than I, if they can't pray near the Kaaba, can they actually complete the Hajj? Or does this ruling effectively bar women from a tenet of Islam?

This morning I was listening to NPR as they did a piece on converts to Islam. One woman described the Koran as "a blueprint for feminism." What a very strange sort of feminism that must be.

By somnilista, FCD (not verified) on 13 Sep 2006 #permalink