Group & kin selection

I promised I'd go over the recent PNAS paper, Group selection and kin selection: Two concepts but one process. This is one of those articles where most of the heavy lifting is in the technical appendix. I've decided that it isn't worth the effort to restate this verbally in detail, I looked over the algebra and I didn't catch anything glaring (though I could have looked more closely), and would have felt ridiculous pointing out where they used "the chain rule here." The main point that I gathered from this paper is that Martin Nowak's model used groups which did not split very often, but persisted for long periods only subject to within group dynamics. Operationally by the time that splitting did occur Nowak's groups would be inbred as all the individuals exhibited identity by descent from a common genetic ancestor for the locus in question (which would be fixed).1 This means that the coefficient of relatedness within these groups is on average about ~1. In other words, the demes that compete within Nowak's model are actually simply extended families for whom inclusive fitness applies as well.

1 - In small groups most alleles go extinct either through drift or selection over the long term so that one allele at a given generation, t, eventually fixes to 100% at t + n generations. Mutation-selection balance and balancing selection can maintain polymorphism isolated populations.

Tags

More like this

A few days ago I posted about selection and population structure. The basic idea is to imagine demes, breeding populations, and consider how variation in the standard parameters such as selection coefficient and migration might affect the overall frequencies of the alleles. The paper, Fixation…
A few days ago I introduced how higher levels of selection could occur via a "toy" example. Obviously it wasn't realistic, and as RPM pointed out a real population is not open ended in its growth potential. I simply wanted to allude to the seeds of how Simpson's Paradox might occur, where…
Chad Orzel is asking about misconceptions in science that irritate. Evolgen and Afarensis have chimed in. My problem is not an misconception, it is a pet peeve. As I've noted before, random genetic drift is a catchall explanation for everything. I am not saying drift is not powerful, it is the…
Evolutionary genetics is subject to parameters; forces which pull and push and shape the nature of dynamic processes over time and space. Population size, mtuation rate, migration, selection. etc., these are all parameters we have to keep in mind when attempting to analyze the nature of…