Erick Trinkaus on Neandertal Admixture

Erick Trinkaus has a new article in PNAS, European early modern humans and the fate of the Neandertals:

A consideration of the morphological aspects of the earliest modern humans in Europe (more than ~33,000 B.P.) and the subsequent Gravettian human remains indicates that they possess an anatomical pattern congruent with the autapomorphic (derived) morphology of the earliest (Middle Paleolithic) African modern humans. However, they exhibit a variable suite of features that are either distinctive Neandertal traits and/or plesiomorphic (ancestral) aspects that had been lost among the African Middle Paleolithic modern humans...The ubiquitous and variable presence of these morphological features in the European earlier modern human samples can only be parsimoniously explained as a product of modest levels of assimilation of Neandertals into early modern human populations as the latter dispersed across Europe. This interpretation is in agreement with current analyses of recent and past human molecular data.

The key word is "modest." Last fall when I was talking about Neandertal introgression I wanted emphasize that the level of interbreeding could be minimal, but if the selective value of the alleles which cross the deme-barrier was high then those alleles should naturally spread. In contrast, those alleles who did not have great selective value would be purified from the gene pool. Finally, alleles which were neutral would could impart information about the extent of interbreeding because their character would be determined by the ancestral proportions.

Out of Africa, total replacement, was elegant in its simplicity. But if the genetic data continues to suggest that the evolutionary dynamics were a bit more complicated than that (i.e., different forces shaping different regions of the genome) then we need to look to the bones & stones people who have been studying morphological variation to flesh out a fuller picture.

Via Dienekes via Yann.

Tags

More like this

Neandertals and moderns mixed, and it matters: Twenty-five years ago, the Middle-to-Upper Paleolithic transition in Europe could be represented as a straightforward process subsuming both the emergence of symbolic behavior and the replacement of Neandertals by modern humans...Over the last decade,…
A day or so back, I posted on an AP article which declared that "skull found in a cave in Romania includes features of both modern humans and Neanderthals, possibly suggesting that the two may have interbred thousands of years ago." The original research article is now online. Let's look at the…
What was Neanderthal-Modern Human interaction really like? Fifty four teeth (some of which are fragments) and nine other bones dating to about 40-43,000 years ago represent the "most recent, and largest, sample of southern Iberian late Neanderthals currently known." These and some closely…
Dental maturational sequence and dental tissue proportions in the early Upper Paleolithic child from Abrigo do Lagar Velho, Portugal: Neandertals differ from recent and terminal Pleistocene human populations in their patterns of dental development, endostructural (internal structure) organization,…

Oh, right. Like we didn't invent fire, hunting and those very cool stone tools, that you "borrowed" from us.

Dr. Trinkhaus says: "of modest levels of assimilation of Neandertals into early modern human populations "... Dude- He needs to get a life! His Great Grandmother ^50 and her skinny friends couldn't get ENOUGH of the old Caveman gene, if you know what I'm saying... and there wasn't ANYTHING modest about her either!

Stop on by the crib, and if you don't mind, bring a couple of chicks. They'll thank you for it later.

http://cavemancrib.com/

ciao