Why brown people are different shades of brown....

i-9ccf394c0b282a7b77cfcbd036a8f8d0-actresses.jpgWhy are brown people so many shades of brown? If you were raised in a South Asian family I'm sure that you've had to deal with the "color" issue somehow. This isn't a cultural blog, so I'm not going to go there, but I do think that the salience of complexion in South Asian culture makes this new paper, A genome-wide association study of skin pigmentation in a South Asian population (PDF), of more than passing interest. If you plotted a frequency distribution of skin reflectances of South Asians within 2 standard deviations from the median you would see a range from brunette white from nearly black skin. Even eliminating the confounding factor of environment (upper class South Asians often are at great pains to prevent the exposure of their skin to sunlight so that it can stay as light as possible, an option that rural peasants don't generally have), the question is why such a diverse range?.

First, the Indian subcontinent is a subcontinent. From the northwest to the southeast you have a diversity of peoples which is second only to Africa (this is often born out by studies of neutral markers). Over the past few thousand years there have been many newcomers to the subcontinent, as evidenced by the languages (Indo-Europeans from the northwest) or lifestyles (rice agriculture from the northeast). It is therefore a common explanation that the variation in complexion in South Asia is a function of ancestry. The lighter skinned populations tend to cluster in the northwest and amongst the upper castes, and these are the groups with the greatest levels of exogenous genetic input (note that there is a great overlap here!). That being said, neutral markers seem to imply that about 90% of the ancestry of South Asians is indigenous at least to the threshold of 10,000 years before the present. In plainer language 9 out of 10 ancestors of any given South Asian was probably a resident of the Indian subcontinent 10,000 years ago. The balance of the ancestry is of course not trivial. It seems likely that the 1 out of 10 ancestors that were exogenous made significant contributions to South Asian culture, from the Indo-Aryan (and likely Dravidian) languages to the Islamic religion which 1 out of 3 South Asians are members of. The story of lactase persistence also suggests that the genetic contribution of that 1 out of 10 was also very significant in driving recent adaptations.

But in any case, the studies of skin pigmentation allows us to go beyond folk biology and explore the genetic architecture of this trait. Here is the major section of the abstract:

...Polymorphisms in three genes, SLC24A5, TYR and SLC45A2, yielded highly significant replicated associations with skin reflectance measurements, an indirect measure of melanin content in the skin. The associations detected in these three genes, in an additive manner, collectively account for a large fraction of the natural variation of skin pigmentation in a South Asian population....

My previous posts about skin color imply that the variation on this trait in our species is due to a bit less than half a dozen genes of large effect which operate in an additive and independent manner. To give a concrete example, 25-40% of the between population difference in average complexion between Europeans and Africans can be attributed to a polymorphism on SLC24A5. But, since the frequencies of the alleles are disjoint (Africans tend to be fixed for one variant and Europeans for another) SLC24A5 can not explain the within population variance (e.g., the differences between males and females across populations are not due to genetic differences as much as the relationship between sex hormones and the melanin regulatory pathways). One of the interesting findings of the genomics of skin color is that different populations have achieved the same phenotypic state via alternative architectures. For example, Europeans and East Asians seem to have arrived at fair skin through different genetic means. Additionally, the evolution of very light skin also seems to be relatively recent. The spread of mutant varieties which result in fairness seems to post-date the Ice Age; e.g., SLC24A5 and the blue-eye variant of OCA2 both began to rise in frequency within the last 10,000 years.

So what's going on with South Asians? The study is pretty simple in concept, the authors were looking to see variations of allele frequencies that tracked skin color differences. They used source populations of Punjabis, Gujaratis, Bangladeshis and Sri Lankans. These groups exhibit different mean skin colors and obviously have distinct evolutionary histories so they tried to account for population substructure to eliminate spurious correlations. The short of is that they found what they were looking for, the genes which they found to have a large effect were the ones you would expect from previous studies of Europeans, Asians and Africans. Interestingly, SLC24A5 plays a large role here. The same SNP which accounted for 25-40% of the variance between Africans and Europeans accounted for over 30% of the variance between the lightest and darked quintiles of skin color. In other words, there was a sharp difference in the frequency of the SNP rs1426654 between the lightest and darkest 20% of their pooled sample, 49% of the light-skinned group carried the rs1426654 which is fixed in Europeans while only 10% of the dark-skinned group did. When I went and looked for previous reports of this SNP that included South Asians I found the following:

South Asians, N=87 derived = 0.820 (fixed in Europe) ancestral = 0.180 (fixed in Africa and East Asian)

The frequency of the derived allele seems a bit high, and is higher than that reported above. There might be some issues with the population selected in this case, but in any case, the bigger picture is this: South Asians carry an allele of SLC24A5 which has been sweeping across various Eurasian and North African populations for the past 10,000 years due to very powerful selective forces (selection coefficients on the order of 10%). Whether the frequency within South Asia is 30% or 80%, the major point is that this is a new variant which likely has its origins in northwest Eurasia (it is fixed in Europe). I am skeptical that migration can explain this, just as I am skeptical that migration can explain the high rates of lactase persistence. In African Americans the frequency of SLC24A5 alleles maps almost perfectly onto independent estimates of admixture of European and African ancestry. But this was a recent hybridization event; my own hunch is that the high frequencies of SLC24A5 are the result of selection within the last 10,000 years in South Asia, just as they were in Europe, the Middle East and North Africa.

On a broader evolutionary canvass I think the fact that the three loci which were smoked out by this association study as being implicated in skin color variance also play the same role in Europe is something that has to be considered as part of a bigger picture. As I note above South Asians seem to be predominantly indigenous to the subcontinent on the time scale of Ice Ages. So are Europeans, the preponderance of the evidence is that 3 out of 4 ancestors of modern Europeans were resident on the continent of Europe at the end of the last Ice Age (the frequency of Neolithic farmers as local contributions of ancestry declines in a southeast to northwest cline). In terms of neutral markers South Asians are an outgroup to Middle Eastern & European populations, and share a common ancestry during the Ice Age (a non-trivial, but minority, contribution from West Asia within the last 10,000 years is confirmed of course). Nevertheless, despite this distant relationship there seems a pattern on a subset of functional loci (skin color, lactase persistence, etc.) that many disparate West Eurasian and North African populations have been subject to the same evolutionary processes with the rise of agriculture. In contrast, East Asians seem to have been genetically more isolated from these dynamics, as evidenced by their independent evolutionary adaptations (in the case of skin color, convergence, in the case of lactase persistence a totally alternative phenotype). This maps onto the pattern of cultural evolution since the rise of civilization depicted in William H. McNiel's marcohistory The Human Web. Though the Indian subcontinent was a distinct cultural hearth in relation to the West, broadly inclusive of the Middle East and Europe, it was far more connected than China to a broader Eurasian cultural network early on (there was almost certainly trade between Sumer and the Indus Valley civilization). This was of course a function of geography, the border between India and the rest of West Eurasia is relatively porous, as evidenced by the diffusion of genes and cultural ideas (Buddhism to the West, Islam to the East). In contrast, China was a civilization apart until recently; with independent philosophical and political traditions only dimly impacted by "Western" (which is often conflated with Indian because of Buddhism!) developments. In sum, patterns of cultural diffusion and exchange may serve as a good guide toward the overall spread of functionally salient alleles across Eurasia over the last 10,000 years. Genes are culture not only coevolved, but likely were subject to parallel constraints and adaptive landscapes.


More like this

Over the history of this weblog I have blogged about pigmentation a fair amount. The major reason is that that's where the money is; unlike height, let alone intelligence, the genetic architecture and evolutionary history of pigmentation has been elucidated with relative clarity. That is, we know…
Over the past few weeks I've been looking closely at all the skin color related genes in humans which have been studied over the past few years. A little over two years ago the evolutionary biologist Armand Leroi wrote: We don't know what the differences are between white skin and black skin,…
One of the main facts about American life is hypodescent, "the practice of determining the lineage of a child of mixed-race ancestry by assigning the child the race of his or her more socially subordinate parent." Barack Obama & the Kenyan politician Raila Odinga (who, probably falsely, claims…
Richard Sturm in Human Molecular Genetics has a really good review of the current state of pigmentation genetics, with a human centric focus: The genetic basis underlying normal variation in the pigmentary traits of skin, hair and eye colour has been the subject of intense research directed at…

The next interesting question is, What alleles introgressed from South Asians into Europeans and spread? I'll anticipate your first answer and say "greater body hair." But aside from that?

There's always the possibility of convergent evolution, but I would be surprised if greater flexibility / hypermobility in southern Europe doesn't result in part from S.Asian, or at least "Middle Eastern" alleles.

That's a pretty good motto to base European - South Asian relations on, right? "South Asia: helping White people dance for the past 10,000 years."

Who is the chica on the right?

Have you seen The Office clip online where the character Ryan says, "I think I dated a black girl" when referring to Asian Indian character Kelly Kapoor?

Who is the chica on the right?

bipasha basu. that's the darkest skinned female bollywood actress i could find (though my skillz in this area are not practiced ;-) she's probably a bit lighter skinned than the average 'brown,' but she is supposedly he token 'darkie' in bollywood (i'm not counting the super dark comic relief actors who act like buffoons).

"We bring you the Plague, and some booty-shakin' alleles to help some of you get a date despite being ridden by the Plague."

I'm pretty good about using "brown," slipped my mind.

While trying to see who this Kelly Kapoor is, I ran into a photo of Deepika Padukone, a model and son of a badminton champion. How cool is that? She made #1 on a net list of "100 Beautiful Indian Women." Amit -- maybe the other girl is in that list somewhere. Wouldn't be a waste of time to click through them all.

er, she's the daughter of a badminton champion...

well, if you are an assman what does it matter? both gotz ass....

A voluptuous booty don't look nuthin' like a man-ass. And you're one to talk -- you like height and legs.

Always the same objection from ass-haters. Just looking around the world, the more manly cultures value the derriere most. Doesn't make it right or wrong, but that is the correlation.

amongst the upper castes, and these are the groups with the greatest levels of exogenous genetic input

That's rather ironic. I wonder how well-known that is in India and if it would help critics of the system.

That's rather ironic. I wonder how well-known that is in India and if it would help critics of the system.

1) it is well known (even before genetic data confirmed the trend).

2) only in places like tamil nadu where 'dravidian nationalists' use racialist language to mobilize political support.

"I am skeptical that migration can explain this, just as I am skeptical that migration can explain the high rates of lactase persistence......... my own hunch is that the high frequencies of SLC24A5 are the result of selection within the last 10,000 years in South Asia, just as they were in Europe, the Middle East and North Africa".

there was an interesting study sometime back by Bamshad et al comparing Y chromosome variation in different Indian castes with European and Asian populations. They found that upper caste Indians in their sample to have greater affinity to Europeans than to eastern Asian, a finding that seems to support the contention that Indo-European speakers migrated into India (begining around 1800-1500 B.C)and the males imposed themselves into high ranking positions in the incipient caste system. It will be interesting to see if frequencies of SLC24A5 and European affinity Y chromosome markers co-vary in different Indian castes.

It will be interesting to see if frequencies of SLC24A5 and European affinity Y chromosome markers co-vary in different Indian castes.

'europeans' is too coarse, i believe that there is generally a closer relationship to middle eastern/central asians. e.g., the m17/r1a lineage on the Y. the field is still pretty fluid and there's contradictory stuff. but, the balance of studies seem to be

1) most south asians are descendants of people who were there at the end of the last ice age

2) the proportion who carry genes which cluster with groups oustide of south asia increases as you move northwest and up the caste ladder

3) nevertheless, all native south asian groups excluding a few outliers such as parsis (who are historically attested migrants from iran) tend to be more similar, on balance, to each other than to outside groups (some of the early work by bamshad showed the distinct affinities you note, but i don't think this has generally held up, though both upper caste and dalit activists like to emphasize that work for obvious reasons).

Color doesn't matter...i don't understand that the indian perception of this whole topic...i would do anything to look like bipasha basu who has an amazing complexion that i crave for im sick of my aishwarya rai white nasty complexion. the darker the better.:)

As a follow-on, it would be good to identify terms for the different brown tones we find in India, (also middle-east and latin america).

Here is a top-of-my head list -

(1) light brown - A-Rai and the rest of the bollywood fraternity

(2) nice brown - Bipasha above! - or is this real brown?

(3) red brown - typical of many folks in southern and eastern india, a lovely blend between red and brown

(4) black brown - or maybe plain black - but I do see some difference between african black and indian black - to my eyes there is a tinge of blue when you look at some of the indian tribal peoples for example

(5) yellow brown - nepali, indo-burmese peoples, hill peoples in many regions of india.

Each of these skin colors is quite delightful in its own way, but we lack the language to reference them.

And what about the blue-skinned krishna, is that another shade of brown or is it just a convention? Krishna actually means black (in Sanskrit).