What's the matter with Sausalito?

Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science has an interesting post up, Income, religious attendance, and voting:

Church attendance is a strong predictor of how high-income people vote, not such a good predictor for low-income voters.

Why? I think the most likely explanation is that cultural considerations become more salient as one increases up the income ladder. Check out their chart.

Tags

More like this

In the U.S., the gap in life expectancy by income is getting wider. To be even clearer: Life expectancy for people with higher incomes has gone up over time, while life expectancy for people earning lower incomes has actually declined. In “The Growing Gap in Life Expectancy by Income: Implications…
A week ago I posted on the gender gap in politics; today Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science critiques a similar argument: Via Craig Newmark, I saw a column by John Lott summarizing his 1999 paper with Lawrence Kenny, "Did women's suffrage change the size and scope of…
Earlier this week we discussed the relationship between life satisfaction and other measures of well-being, finding that for measures such as relative income, the happiest people weren't always the best-off. For relationships, however, the happiest individuals also seem to do better. But these…
OK, time for a few links. First up, there's a very good new blog by cognitive anthropologists called Alpha Psy. I disagreed pretty strongly with some of the points in their post on terror management theory, but overall I've really enjoyed the blog so far. I strongly recommend the post on majority…

That is a very interesting chart!

I suspect that it is the same for Jews and synagogue.

I think that it is the result of describing two types of religion with one word - i.e. "religion" at the low end of the income spectrum tends to mean something somewhat different from "religion" at the high end.