John Hawks has everything you need to know. Question: how did this get by peer review?
- Log in to post comments
More like this
The House of Commons (U.K.) Select Committee on Science and Technology investigated Open Access publishing alternatives, and pursuant to this obtained written evidence from Nature Publishing Group consisting of answers to specific questions about "pay to publish." Here are excerpts from the…
Me: So how long has it been since you first submitted your paper to XXX?
Resident Genius Postdoc: Next week it'll be eight months.
Me: Wow, that's almost like pregnancy.
Resident Genius Postdoc: At least there's an end to pregnancy.
Me: Yeah, I guess you can always get a c-section.
Question: why…
It often comes as a surprise to proponents of alternative medicine and critics of big pharma that I'm a big fan of John Ioannidis. Evidence of this can easily be found right here on this very blog just by entering Ioannidis' name into the search box. Indeed, my first post about an Ioannidis paper…
There's an article in yesterday's New York Times about doubts the public is having about the goodness of scientific publications as they learn more about what the peer-review system does, and does not, involve. It's worth a read, if only to illuminate what non-scientists seem to have assumed went…
Why, with so many people willing to buy into the implausible idea that Sasquatch existed and survive undiscovered by humans, are so many people hostile to the possibility of hobbit-like creatures? Tiny intelligent primates seem far more likely.
Are the bones too mythological-seeming for people to appear 'respectable' admitting to their likely significance?