A few years ago it was shown that white America fertility correlated 0.86 to voting for George W. Bush in 2004 on a state by state level. What that means is pretty simple, if you have the 50 states + DC, and plot their white fertility on the X axis and % voting for George W. Bush on the Y axis the variation of X could predict about 3/4 of the variation of Y. That's pretty good. But what about on an individual level? The differences here aren't so stark. In short, those whites who voted for John F. Kerry wanted nearly as many children as those whites who voted for George W. Bush. They simply didn't have them. See charts derived from GSS data below the fold....
- Log in to post comments
More like this
The map to the left shows the counties which voted for Obama (blue) and McCain (red) in the 2008 election. The blue counties are part of the Black Belt, the area where blacks are a majority of the population because of the economic concentration of cotton culture during the 19th and 20th centuries…
Barry Kosmin at CUNY has published the results of three surveys of American religion since 1990. These "American Religious Identification Surveys" (ARIS) were done in 1990, another in 2001, and finally in 2008. One of the major findings of the ARIS has been the rise of those who avow "No Religion…
One social science finding which I've wondered about over the past few years is the result that women care much more about the race of a potential mate than men do. The fact that individuals tend to want to mate assortatively with those who share their characteristics is no surprise. Rather,…
I suggested below that though on average whites did not move toward the Democrats, regionally there might be differences. I inferred this from the fact that areas where blacks are thin on the ground in the South it looks as if John McCain did better than George W. Bush in 2004. So I compared the…
I'd love to see a graph of the mother's age at birth of first child, to see how much that explains the difference.
done.
Thanks for this.
Is the Democrat/ Republican difference in fertility explained by differences in religiousness, as Eric Kaufman of Birkbeck College, London has suggested?
http://www.sneps.net/RD/uploads/06prospect-Kaufmann.pdf
Would it be possible for you to introduce controls for religiousness?
i did a few queries. perhaps that is the difference. but it looks like that is a religion X politics interaction. conservative secularists don't have many fewer children than conservative fundies, but the variation across liberals is much bigger.
I'm a conservative secularist and I've got 4 kids. Simply put, I like children. No need for direction from On High.
Wait... nearly 20% of white Demograts had a kid before they hit 20? Is that right? Wow.
Also, not to be nitpicky, but I think the 2nd graph should be entitled "Actual Number of Children," not "Actually Number of Children." :-)