Chad has a post up about Cosmic Variance's move to Discover Blogs. He notes that some people lamenting the decline of the "old blogosphere" haven't been around blogs that long. He doesn't mention that he's been blogging since 2002. So have I. Most blogs have always sucked, that's a constant. Some of the less-sucky ones now have the option of remuneration. With four major competing scienceblog networks I think you'll get some competition driving quality. Granted, a great deal of blog writing will remain crap; just like a great deal of the media. The laws of the universe have not changed. And the "good old days" were not really that good.... (e.g., the "warblogging era," where I was unfortunately a marginal player).
- Log in to post comments
More like this
The announcement of Cosmic Variance's sell-out has prompted some people to link to Nicholas Carr's lament for days gone by:
Blogging seems to have entered its midlife crisis, with much existential gnashing-of-teeth about the state and fate of a literary form that once seemed new and fresh and now…
Last week, I gave my evangelical talk about science blogging to the Physics department at Wright State, and also a lot of education students who came to the talk (which made a nice change in the sort of questions I got). It's basically this talk that I gave at Cornell a couple of years ago, with a…
For now, at least.
My natural inclinations about this whole mess are probably closest in nature to either Chad Orzel's or Jason Rosenhouse's, so reading them will probably give you a pretty close idea of where I stand. Bora, not surprisingly, has collected a lot of the reaction.
I also really like…
We haven't had a good navel-gazing kerfuffle around here in a while, but not to worry-- Bayblab comes to the rescue with a broadside against the current state of science blogging, as epitomized by ScienceBlogs:
If you examine the elephant in the room, ScienceBlogs, the trend is maintained: politics…
Discover is just a pale shadow of what it once was. I picked up an issue about a year ago, and was shocked at how far it had fallen from the days when I had a subscription.
Discover used to have intelligently-written articles that were both accurate and comprehensible to people not familiar with the field. Now it's double-spaced, wide-margined nonsense, with lots of double page photo spreads and little content.
It boggles my mind to think that someone would choose to associate themselves with the magazine if they didn't need to support themselves financially.
It boggles my mind to think that someone would choose to associate themselves with the magazine if they didn't need to support themselves financially.
blogs are blogs. though true they are on the discover domain. i think the main issue is that running a high traffic blog like CV ends up sucking up a lot of time re: tech support, etc. it's about opportunity costs, not the $.
I actually thought Jennifer already wrote over there so I was surprised it wasn't a part of Discover before now. I think it's a good fit because of the miracle of compounding. Most popular writers here (or on any of the large blog sites you mentioned above) benefited from the compounding that occurred by aggregating so that's always a good reason to move to a bigger stage.
I actually thought Jennifer already wrote over there so I was surprised it wasn't a part of Discover before now.
she writes for discovery :-) it confused me too....
you don't consider nature network one of the major science blogging networks?
i always thought of it more as a social networking site. but sure, add them to the list.