A new bunch of math text books slated for implementation in Texas was werefound to have 109,263 errors. Apparently, in Texas, the publishers are fined $5000 per error. That comes out to $546,315,000.
The publisher, Houghton Mifflin, is working hard to correct the errors....
- Log in to post comments
More like this
The San Antonio Express-News
href="http://www.politicalgateway.com/news/read/114296">reports
that "Reviewers have found 109,263 errors in sample copies of math
textbooks to be used next fall in Texas."
One second-grade math book, for example,
has 4 plus 7 equaling 10.
OK, anybody can…
Sorry for not posting an update last Friday, but I was in the Board meeting and then on a plane. I gather most of you found the news update at NCSE's website, where traffic hit record levels.
As you recall, the Texas State Board of Education met on Thursday as the Committee of the Full Board to…
tags: book review, Peterson Field Guide, field guide to the birds, birding, North American birds, Roger Tory Peterson
No one has done more to advance and popularize birdwatching than artist and naturalist, Roger Tory Peterson (RTP), who published his first field guide to the birds in 1934 at the…
It is an unquestioned belief among believers in alternative medicine and even just among many people who do not trust conventional medicine that conventional medicine kills. Not only does exaggerating the number of people who die due to medical complications or errors fit in with the world view of…
Next time you reference a six-sentence article, would you mind reading it first?
Thanks ever so very much!
Yeah, it's actually 164 textbooks.
How could one math book hold that many errors? Ah, it's many books.
Moral of the story: Hire a free-lance editor.
I once ran into a fellow editor on the subway. He was pulling little scraps of paper out of his pockets and making notes. I asked him what he was doing, and he said he was editing a textbook. Apparently, those scraps were the manuscript he was given!
I assume the size of the potential fine was worked out in a neighbouring state.
Hey, that averages out to 666 errors per textbook.
Coincidence?
Textbooks of the Beast!!
free-lance editor here:
The original version is correct: "a bunch" is the subject of the verb, so the proper conjugation is "was". A bunch {of books} WAS to have errors. I know it sounds odd...
Compare to "A pile of books was sitting in the driveway."
The best way to avoid this ugly grammar is to avoid it:
"n books were examined, and they contained a total of m errors."
BTW: were they written by "cintelligent design proponentsists"? They're always good for redefining reality.