Skip to main content
Advertisment
Home

Main navigation

  • Life Sciences
  • Physical Sciences
  • Environment
  • Social Sciences
  • Education
  • Policy
  • Medicine
  • Brain & Behavior
  • Technology
  • Free Thought
  1. gregladen
  2. Happy Birthday Daryl Hannah

Happy Birthday Daryl Hannah

  • facebook
  • twitter
  • reddit
  • linkedin
  • email
  • print
Profile picture for user gregladen
By gregladen on December 2, 2007.

i-19c0c98d5e5413ad8f4474d6a6d0ec62-hannah.jpg

Tags
Uncategorized
  • Log in to post comments

More like this

Happy Birthday Amanda!
Happy Birthday Richard Pryor
Katz - hungry edition
Happy Birthday Charles Addams
Advertisment

Donate

ScienceBlogs is where scientists communicate directly with the public. We are part of Science 2.0, a science education nonprofit operating under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Please make a tax-deductible donation if you value independent science communication, collaboration, participation, and open access.

You can also shop using Amazon Smile and though you pay nothing more we get a tiny something.

 

Science 2.0

  • Lottery Bottle Bill Could Improve Recycling
  • Bubbles In Ice Could Be A Future Medium For Secret Codes
  • Nearly Complete Harbin Skull From 146,000 Years Ago Belongs To The Denisovan Lineage
  • Humans Have Always Adapted To Changing Climates - It's Why We Conquered The World
  • Golden Dome Missile Shield A 'No-Brainer', According To EMP Expert

Science Codex

More by this author

Last Post
October 30, 2017
This is my last post at Scienceblogs.com. In the future I will be blogging at Greg Laden's blog, located at its original home at gregladen.com. I have a feeling that Scienceblogs will not last long without me. What do you think? :) But seriously, I'll be talking about the story of the current…
Hacking Voting Machines
October 10, 2017
In every area of life, but especially in the overlapping realms of technology, science, and health, misunderstanding how things work can be widespread, and that misunderstanding can lead to problems. In the area of voting, the main problem seems to be the expenditure of great amounts of outrage and…
On that chilling law suit against the environmental groups
October 5, 2017
... which I've posted on before ... there are new developments, summarized at Inside Climate News: Invoking the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO, a federal conspiracy law devised to ensnare mobsters, the suit accuses the organizations, as well as several green campaigners…
One response to the Las Vegas Shooting
October 5, 2017
from a major non profit, click through the the X Blog to read the press release.
Watch Jeff Merkley Wipe Floor With Trump's William Wehrum
October 5, 2017
William Wehrum is a lawyer and once, apparently, worked for the EPA. Trump is trying to appoint him to be assistant administrator for air and radiation. This is a reasonably important job that concerns many aspects of the environment. Watch: https://twitter.com/SenJeffMerkley/status/…

More reads

Anger is an energy? Maybe, but it doesn't help you evaluate vaccine science
Anger is an energy, as a certain old punk sang back in the 1980s. It can even be a great motivator, such as when anger overtakes us for injustice or over crimes. Anger, however, is not a particularly good intellectual tool, nor does it help in analyzing science. Which reminds me: J.B. Handley is back. You have to be a bit of a long time reader—OK, a really long time reader—to remember that Mr.…
Ask Ethan #93: Newton’s Random Apple (Synopsis)
“Millions saw the apple fall, but Newton was the one who asked why.” -Bernard Baruch Take a common, macroscopic object -- like an apple -- and imagine what's going on inside at the level of individual particles. At a small, fundamental scale, they're just bouncing off of one another, rapidly in motion due to the nature of kinetic theory. Each particle has a certain amount of energy, collides with…
Will 2016 see a landslide in the POTUS election?
No. Many many people, well intended, smart people, keep talking about the rout, the landslide, that will happen. They may be basing this on the new trend started by FiveThirtyEight and picked up by the New York Times and others of deriving a probability statement about the race. But when you see something like "87%" for Clinton in such an estimate, that does not mean that Clinton will get 87%…

© 2006-2024 Science 2.0. All rights reserved. Privacy statement. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Science 2.0, a science media nonprofit operating under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are fully tax-deductible.