You are right, Bill. We don't care about Christmas. We simply believe that no religion should be in the public square. Finally you get it.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
When Richard Dawkins and Bill O'Reilly are on the same side of an issue, it's a surprise. When it's an issue that involves religion in the public sphere, it's quite possibly a sign that the apocalypse is drawing nigh. Nevertheless, that seems to be the case at the moment.
Bill O'Reilly's views…
This week is Thanksgiving in the United States. This means that over the coming weekend many Americans will be putting up Christmas decorations in and outside their houses. Many children will be putting finishing touches on their letters to Santa. The shopping malls will start to fill and while…
The latest hilarious dust-up over religion has to do with an ad on DC buses scheduled for the holidays by the American Humanist Association (AHA):
Ads proclaiming, "Why believe in a god? Just be good for goodness' sake," will appear on the outside and inside of DC Metro buses starting next Tuesday…
I am amazed at the giddiness amongst Christian Fundamentalists that has fomented from the mere utterance of a holiday greeting by Richard Dawkins. The counter-insurgents in the War on Christmas ... the Red White and Blue, squeaky-faced smirking shits that call themselves commentators or preachers…
OReilly states:
Sure there is. It's variously called a church, temple, synagogue, mosque, ...
Does this mean he's gonna shut up now?
Oh no! Bill O' Reilly is such a conceited idiot who thinks he knows everything...
OReilly states:
> There's no place in American public life for any expression of spirituality.
Yes there is. You can express your beliefs all you want. You just can't use my tax dollars to do so. Moreover Christmas displays on government land aren't about showing your religion they're about asserting your belief in the governments religion. Its a pathetic attempt to mark territory. Can't you just use urine like a good little doggy and spare us the eye-sore?