So there, 'intelligent' cdesign proponentists, eat your hearts out.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
(And not in a supportive way). PZ and Orac discussed a recent New England Journal of Medicine editorial critical of intelligent design. Though the article had several shortcomings, it's always a bonus to see other scientists treating ID as a valid threat (not in the scientific sphere, of course,…
Like the gift that never stops giving, the Discovery Institute is taking its dog and pony show on the road, and heading right here to Iowa in order to plead (via press conference) Discovery Institute fellow Guillermo Gonzalez's case for tenure. You may recall the Iowa State assistant professor of…
With my move over to ScienceBlogs I have been thinking about the direction I want to take my blogging. Readers of my old blog will remember that I spent a lot of the time their ranting about intelligent design, politics, ASU sports, etc. I have decided to continue doing so over there, so if you are…
Over on Uncommon Descent, Sal Cordova quotes Lauren Sandler from her book Righteous, in a self-congratulatory attempt to claim the Dover decision as a victory for ID (oh, my, but aren't they desperate). However, if you look at Cordova's quote, there are…ellipses. Seeing an ellipsis in a creationist…
You know the reply to this as well as I do: "The programs 'evolving' those things were designed, so see, it shows ID is right". Just deja vu all over again.
Yeah, you're right. But nice try, though. Carry on trying!
Repeating all the same points over and over is exactly what these IDiots do, so why not return the favor? ;-)
Happy: Great idea. I think in March, I'll just re-run January on this site.
But not February! February will be a very exciting month here!!!