Giant Gromia (amoebas) may account for ancient sea floor tracks

ResearchBlogging.orgA protist is a single celled eukaryotic organism, and they are usually pretty small. You can often see them, though! Before you put that sample of pond water under the microscope, take a close look: Many protists are at the boundary of visibility for humans.

Then, there are the giant protists, grape size, living on the bottom of the sea where they roll around in the mud. It has been known for some time that there are giant deep sea protazoans that are not mobile. Here, though, is a bit of film of giant mobile protists.

A recent paper in Current Biology links these creatures to very ancient trace fossils. In so doing, a beautiful hypothesis is slaughtered by a small, grape size muddy amoeba thingie.

This is from the abstract of the paper:

One of the strongest paleontological arguments in favor of the origin of bilaterally symmetrical animals ... prior to their obvious and explosive appearance in the fossil record in the early Cambrian, 542 million years ago, is the occurrence of trace fossils shaped like elongated sinuous grooves or furrows in the Precambrian ... these traces ... are commonly attributed to the activity of the early nonskeletonized bilaterians or, alternatively, large cnidarians such as sea anemones or sea pens. Here we describe macroscopic groove-like traces produced by a living giant protist and show that these traces bear a remarkable resemblance to the Precambrian trace fossils, including those as old as 1.8 billion years. This is the first evidence that organisms other than multicellular animals can produce such traces, and it prompts re-evaluation of the significance of Precambrian trace fossils as evidence of the early diversification of Bilateria. Our observations also render indirect support to the highly controversial interpretation of the enigmatic Ediacaran biota of the late Precambrian as giant protists...

Here's a picture of one cleaned up, from the paper:

In case you were wondering how much these creatures move .... well, you can't tell from the film above because it is a film of still photos. Here is some moving pictures of the giant protists:

So, there you have it. One of the most exciting finds of the century, and one of the most boring finds of the century, all wrapped up in one!

M MATZ, T FRANK, N MARSHALL, E WIDDER, S JOHNSEN (2008). Giant Deep-Sea Protist Produces Bilaterian-like Traces Current Biology DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.10.028

More like this

The Cambrian vendobiont S. psygmoglena, gen.sp.nov., composite photo of part and counterpart to show both upper and lower surfaces. From the pre-Cambrian and early Cambrian, we have a collection of enigmatic fossils: the small shellies appear to be bits and pieces of partially shelled animals;…
There's a neat Discovery News article about Gromia sphaerica, a very large testate amoeba: A distant relative of microscopic amoebas, the grape-sized Gromia sphaerica was discovered once before, lying motionless at the bottom of the Arabian Sea. But when Mikhail Matz of the University of Texas at…
One of many open questions in evolution is the nature of bilaterian origins—when the first bilaterally symmetrical common ancestor (the Last Common Bilaterian, or LCB) to all of us mammals and insects and molluscs and polychaetes and so forth arose, and what it looked like. We know it had to have…
Some of the biggest misunderstandings about the evolution of life on earth surround the "Cambrian Explosion," the popular impression often being that complex multicellular life sprung up out of nowhere in an instant. While it does appear that there was an "explosion" and that new body plans…

That's amazing! How do they move? Do they build a flagelum-type thing? Do they just roll? We have so much to learn from these things! I guess they already knew giant-celled organisms existed. My biological education has some serious omissions!

Just astonishing. :^)

By bernard quatermass (not verified) on 22 Nov 2008 #permalink


I should have known.

By Robert Jase (not verified) on 22 Nov 2008 #permalink

Robert Jase:
my thoughts exactly.

I don't know, Greg...

Maybe not so boring! Very slick, actually.

By BobbyEarle (not verified) on 23 Nov 2008 #permalink

Someone should mention that Gromia is closely related to the foraminifera. "Amoeba" doesn't mean anything, it just refers to a shape that most eukaryotes can assume at some time in their life cycle. It's like "protist" (which means "eukaryote, but not animal, fungus or plant"), only worse.

By David Marjanović (not verified) on 23 Nov 2008 #permalink

Thanks for the post, Greg. I,too, find this exciting and not the least bit boring. When most people think amoeba, they think of the old high school biology standby Chaos chaos. Personally, I like the testate amoebas; an amoeba with a shell. How cool is that? And one this big? Fossilized amoeba tracks? Trashing the theory on the origins of bilateral symmetry? Who would've thunk?

I, for one, welcome our new amoeboid overlords.

Moby Grape

By Trin Tragula (not verified) on 29 Nov 2008 #permalink