Dozens of papers report MMR vaccine caused death

But almost no papers report retraction of the story following the coroner's verdict that the vaccine played no part in the death.

On Tuesday the Telegraph, the Independent, the Mirror, the Express, the Mail, and the Metro all reported that a coroner was hearing the case of a toddler who died after receiving the MMR vaccine, which the parents blamed for their loss. Toddler 'died after MMR jab' (Metro), 'Healthy' baby died after MMR jab (Independent), you know the headlines by now.

On Thursday the coroner announced his verdict: the vaccine played no part in this child's death. So far, of the papers above, only the Telegraph has had the decency to cover the outcome. The Independent, the Mirror, the Express, the Mail, and the Metro have all decided that their readers are better off not knowing. Tick, tock.

Does it stop there? No. Amateur physicians have long enjoyed speculating that MMR and other vaccinations are somehow "harmful to the immune system" and responsible for the rise in conditions such as asthma and hay fever. Doubtless they must have been waiting some time for evidence to appear.

From the guardian

Tags

More like this

A couple of days ago, I wrote about a story of a sort that I've had to write about far too many times over the last eleven years. I wrote about the death of a child—but not just any death of a child, the death of a child who could have—should have—lived. The child's name was Ezekiel Stephan, and…
It's been a long time since I bothered to care if readers know where I live or who I am. That's why when a newbie troll shows up in the comments, as newbie trolls periodically do, and castigates me for somehow being a "coward" or "hiding" my identity, I generally get a hardy laugh out of it. My…
Thanks to a sterling effort by a group of dedicated science bloggers and blog-readers, the whole Jeni Barnett MMR radio show has been transcribed for your reading pleasure. Browse it, read it, blog it, be shocked, be amazed, tell your friends, etc etc. OBVIOUS DISCLAIMER: This is a transcript…
When I first started this blog, I had little idea of what I was in for. I thought I had some idea from having read a bunch of blogs and found role models whose blogging style I tried to emulate back in those early days, long before I developed the persona and writing style that most of my readers…

What about requesting a rectification with the failing papers? I saw this sad news yesterday on /., I think, but was wondering that it should not be too difficult to have those papers publish a rectification... not sure about US newspapers, but certainly works in NL.

See this are your social obligation when noticing such fails, to report this with the paper and have them rectify the first wrong paper...

If these "journalists" were worth the name and would know what a post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy is,we wouldnt have these articles,and less confused parents.

Ah, but what did the coroner say caused the death? SUDC? Sudden Unexplained Death in Childhood? Lots of people are willing to say that vaccines had no part in the etiology of an illness, catastrophic or otherwise, when they don't know what caused it. That fascinates me. They even say, "We don't know what causes autism, but vaccines have nothing to do with it." Perhaps that's why the papers aren't printing a retraction. If I were the parent I wouldn't be happy with the statement, "vaccines had nothing to do with it." I'd need to know the exact cause.

By Zoey Hampton (not verified) on 14 Feb 2009 #permalink