Cosmic Science News

The basic fabric of the universe is heterogeneous and lumpy. Why? Cosmologists fight over that. Recent theoretical work may be pushing the pendulum towards a string-related explanation (after a period of time when this seemed less likely).

A network of 'cosmic strings' criss-crossing the Universe could be responsible for a mysterious flux of antimatter particles which has been puzzling astronomers. ... theoretical astrophysicist Tanmay Vachaspati at Case Western Reserve University in Ohio, suggests that space may be threaded ... with a network of much lighter strings - too lightweight to be directly responsible for galaxy formation - that could have formed during phase transitions in the Universe's unseen dark matter...
nature

At the other end of the size spectrum, the immutable atom (well, the Greeks thought is was immutable) may, in some cases, be a shape shifter.

Contrary to some expectations in the world of nuclear physics, researchers have found that a radioactive nucleus of sulphur oscillates between two different shapes, sometimes appearing like a sphere and other times like an American football. The result, reported this month by researchers in France, is causing nuclear physicists to rethink prevailing theories about what makes some nuclei stable and others prone to splitting apart.
nature

More like this

“The aim of science is not to open the door to infinite wisdom, but to set a limit to infinite error.” -Bertolt Brecht One of the most frequent questions I get about the Universe -- as a cosmologist -- isn't quite about the Big Bang in and of itself. The expansion of the Universe in reverse; image…
"The whole fabric of the space-time continuum is not merely curved, it is in fact totally bent." -Douglas Adams As many of you know, if you take a whole bunch of mass, and you've got nothing going on except gravity, it's going to gravitationally collapse. And if atoms, nuclei, pressure, and nuclear…
"It took less than an hour to make the atoms, a few hundred million years to make the stars and planets, but five billion years to make man!" -George Gamow Some people are never satisfied. After I wrote last time on the odds for cosmic inflation, I started noticing a flurry of comments on an older…
"`It's quite hard to destroy the Earth.' Does that statement make anyone else nervous? I mean, does that sound like experience talking?" -from the comments on the LHC at slashdot Last week, I started an open thread, giving you the chance to ask about how certain we were about the validity of…

The second nature link is broken - there's a "%3C/blockquote%3E" in it that should not be there.

It's funny how solid-state and fluid physicists don't get to make up their own particles whenever their theories fail to account for the evident universe. Never mind when the mathematics of well-known theories are just too hard to apply.

By Nathan Myers (not verified) on 11 Mar 2009 #permalink

Nathan: That does seem to be a privilege reserved for the theoretical tiny-stuff physicists, cosmologists, and social scientists.