White Man's World: Locally made film of interest

Below the fold owing to adult themes.

More like this

Congratulations to the winners and thanks to all the participants. The stories will go online at TheScian.com within a few days. First prize - "Stalker" by Shuchikar (author's penname) Second prize - "On board the Ark" by Ankit Bhardwaj Third prize - "Dropping Off" by Ramanand I am pleased to say…
I've got banners out the wazoo now: 19 26 have been installed now, and I can always add more, so it's not too late to send one in. As several people have noticed, I was wrong. The actual dimensions of the space allotted for banners is 760x126 pixels, but the bottom 24 pixels are obscured by a menu…
This idea comes from my friend Thomas. His son is like mine in that they both think LEGO are awesome, and they are correct. For some reason, Thomas decided to calculate the price per piece of LEGO in each set. To promote repeatability, I decided to do this also. Looking at the catalog at LEGO.…
This idea comes from my friend Thomas. His son is like mine in that they both think LEGO are awesome, and they are correct. For some reason, Thomas decided to calculate the price per piece of LEGO in each set. To promote repeatability, I decided to do this also. Looking at the catalog at LEGO.…

"It's probably just gonna piss people off."

Yup, I can see that. Even though I'm still not quite sure what it's about.

By equisetum (not verified) on 12 Nov 2009 #permalink

Unoriginal. A sort of In The Company of Men/Borat kind of thing.

I never pass up the chance to point out that NFL fans who espouse to any kind of Native American rights are hypocrites. And that includes a few good friends who I'm still friends with anyways.

MLB ain't far behind, but nothing does it for me like 'Redskins'.

By Rich Wilson (not verified) on 12 Nov 2009 #permalink

@Pundit...

Never saw Guffman, but Spinal Tap wasn't quite what I saw in this trailer. This looks to be real people being insulted by an actor playing a "typical" American-buffoon. It looks more to me like a hyper version of Candid Camera and Punked... you know, obnoxious-to-be-obnoxious. I just never found that stuff even remotely clever. Like walking up behind Grandma and popping a balloon.

Maybe I'm missing something.

mk: This predates the films you mention, which would make it quite original. And no, this is not punked.

It is very good. I'll have a review of it up after I've spoken with the director.

OK... looking forward to it, Greg.

But just to be accurate, I believe In the Company of Men was made in '97 and Borat in '06. From what I can find at the website and in the trailer itself this looks to have been made in '07.

I see ignorance as far as I can see in this. I agree with mk, I don't see it as funny.

By NewEnglandBob (not verified) on 12 Nov 2009 #permalink

Probably not everyone is going to like it, but having seen it, and liked it, I can't help but to say it is good. And it is not even close to a remake or derivative of any of the films or TV shows mentioned above. If it actually matters what the film itself is like, I can say no one is quite near the mark in these comments.

And I say this knowing that Jason Page is an Over the Top Ass. I'm really not happy about having to meet the guy tomorrow. It's going to totally suck.

Of course the chance of you seeing it is zero if it does not get picked up by NetFlicks. But if the film ends up at a festival somewhere I'll be sure to announce it if I know about it.

And honestly, the fact that my BFF Analiese is in it has nothing to do with me liking it. She has a very small auxiliary bit part. Which she does very well.

Well then I really will be looking forward to your review. It may in fact be nothing at all like the films mentioned. It may be interpretation. It may be simply brilliant. But the trailer makes it look horrible, and in a very amateurish way... and your comment above about the director doesn't help with my already negative thoughts. But hey, here's an opportunity for me to grow, right? ;^}

Oh and I should clarify. This film is ABOUT the director who is an asshole, not by him. It is an expose of his assholitude.

This film is ABOUT the director who is an asshole, not by him. It is an expose of his assholitude.

At this point in my life (and in the mood I am in now), I feel there can be no good film about this kind of an asshole, no matter how it is done.

"This film is ABOUT the director who is an asshole, not by him."

That clears it up. That's what I thought from the first part, but then I wasn't sure.

By equisetum (not verified) on 13 Nov 2009 #permalink

Well, I just did the interview. Now I'm going to go take a shower. Gotta find the exfoliant first.