Traumatized By Truth discussed Kids and Drugs: Time for that chat with the kids about drugs...
Comrade PhysioProf notes the non-skeptical nature of some of the reactions among Skeptics to apparent sex bias in the volume edited by Skeptidemigod Dawkins. I had noticed that as well, and the irony is interesting. See: Defending Dawkins
A poem about atheism from Digitial Cuttlefish.
For today's comic interlude: Kent Hovind's Doctoral Dissertation
And finally, some very cool science: Small bird engineers uneasy alliance between hawk and treeshrew
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Kent Hovind's infamous alma mater has put together a collection of responses because they are "under attack!" Only they aren't—they're being laughed at. And whoa, these pages are even more hilarious. (Warning: all of the links below go to pages that fire up some tedious piano music on autoplay…that…
This is a guest post written by Skip Evans. Skip is a dear friend I have known for many years. He worked for some time for the National Center for Science Education and now owns a web development company called Big Sky Penguin. This is the sordid tale of his repeated dealings with the infamous…
You may be aware that there is a huge discussion about framing science going on in the blogosphere. It has gotten out of hand. But, for those who want to dig in, or want to analyze the posts and comments (that is a lot of data!), here is the comprehensive list of links (excluded are links to…
Joshua Joscelyn is a fellow who, once upon a time, worked within Kent Hovind's creation science ministry. No more, though; he has just posted his resignation letter on facebook. Has he finally seen the light of science? Has he at last seen through the fact that Kent Hovind was a deluded and not-…
Thanks for the motherfucking link, holmes!
I was goaded into visiting "The Intersection" and saw an article parroting the bullshit about "Dawkins is sexist because the book he edited doesn't have a % of female authors which exactly match the % of current female authors". Now you can't get any more anti-scientific than that. *sigh* It was difficult to avoid the temptation to post something like "If you write shit like that, it's no wonder it doesn't make it into science books." but that would just make me mysogynistic - like Chris Hitchens I guess with his "blah blah blah blah sexist. blah blah blah blah" comment (which is looking more and more realist than sexist to me).
AHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!! The funniest thing is ignorant fuckwads like you deluding yourselves into thinking that this has anyfuckingthing to do with whether Dawkins "is sexist".
Ah, I see a troll with a superiority complex is projecting again.