Haiti Earthquake Appears to be Very Bad

The earthquake was 7.0 or more (see Eruptions for info and discussion) and was not far from Port-au-Prince. Apparently damage is widespread and intense, and casualties high, but accurate information is limited because the information infrastructure was destroyed (see this for news details).

More like this

A 7.0 magnitude earthquake rocked Haiti yesterday, and while the devastation is readily apparent, the human toll is not yet known. Chris Rowan details the tectonics on the event on Highly Allochtonous, explaining that the epicenter's proximity to Port-au-Prince means the capital "endured the…
Tomas is nicely demonstrating the degree to which meteorological models depend on the context of experience. This season I've read most of the discussions and advisories for most of the Atlantic storms, and generally speaking, the forecasts change only a little from time to time once a storm is…
The Center for Inquiry is accepting disaster-relief donations through its S.H.A.R.E. program to support those providing care to the survivors of the 7.0 earthquake that struck Jan. 12 near the capital city of Port-au-Prince, Haiti. All donations--100 percent with no operating costs retained--will…
It's a relief that Hurricane Tomas didn't destroy the camps in and around Port-au-Prince where 1.3 million survivors of Haiti's January earthquake are crowded. The storm hit western Haiti hardest, causing flooding and killing 20 people. There are still concerns about how flooding will affect Haiti…

Been watching this too - we have two nieces who went there just after New Year for mission work. they were scheduled to leave today but haven't heard from them - am hoping they are (only) late to get out or having trouble getting to the airport.

Yeah, there's been about 10 ca 5 mag aftershocks since the initial earthquake, according to that resource.

Holy crap, M7 is huge. I've been ~80km from the epicenter of an earthquake that size and the ground motion was still about 1m in the horizontal and maybe as much as 30cm in the vertical. If a quake that size hit any Australian city the city would be flattened; buildings there start to collapse in earthquakes that Californians simply shrug off.

By MadScientist (not verified) on 12 Jan 2010 #permalink

@MadScientist

If a quake that size hit any Australian city the city would be flattened; buildings there start to collapse in earthquakes that Californians simply shrug off.

[Not so] funny thing, my friends and I were just discussing the same idea - last week, we had a 6.5 up in Humbolt here in CA, and it was 'felt' but no real big problems (and it was felt). Same thing happens anywhere they are are unprepared, and buildings fall.Good thing we learned our lesson

Horrible images from Haiti this morning - I'm glad I didn't see them last night.
Our nieces did get out -both of their phones and their laptop were out of juice, so they couldn't communicate: my sister-in-law says when she spoke to them (from florida overnight) they told her their plane left a few hours before. lucky, but far too many weren't.