New intelligence test results are a mixed bag

A new intelligence test is out, and the results are in some cases quite expected, and in other cases somewhat surprising.

Briefly, the results indicate that women are smarter than men, people of retired age are smarter than 20 year olds, self declared "Republicans", "Democrats" and "Conservatives" are all about equally stupid, but "Moderates" are really dumb and "Liberals" are extraordinarily smart.

In a somewhat less rigorous version of the test, more differences are revealed: In this version, "Republicans" and "Conservatives" are morons, there is a reversal by age categories and the old grow stupid compared to the young, but males remain of highly questionable intelligence and "Liberals" still rule.

Here's the data:

i-15e35a21a863183ba0f9d4769ff8c5dd-BP_intelligence_test.jpg

Source.

More like this

My posts below on IQ, politics & religion resulted in a fair amount of blogospheric response, and weird comments. A few quick points 1) I think results on standardized tests are informative and correlate reasonably with a host of life outcomes. If you don't think they do, that's fine, I don't…
One "urban legend" which is in common circulation among my friends is that liberals are smarter than conservatives. From my own personal experience this seems plausible, and I doubt I'm the only one as evidenced by the furious speed at which the "Bush voting states have lower IQs" meme spread…
The Norman Lear Center recently commissioned a Zogby poll regarding the relative media preferences of liberals, moderates, and conservatives: href="http://www.learcenter.org/html/projects/?cm=zogby">The Zogby/Lear Center Survey On Politics And Entertainment. The typology revealed three…
I've always been reluctant to attribute antiscientific attitudes to one political persuasion or another--and justly so, or so I thought. While it's true that antiscience on the right is definitely more prominent these days, with the Republican candidates conducting virtual seminars on how to deny…