Medical ethicist Harvey Fineberg shows us three paths forward for the ever-evolving human species: to stop evolving completely, to evolve naturally -- or to control the next steps of human evolution, using genetic modification, to make ourselves smarter, faster, better. Neo-evolution is within our grasp. What will we do with it?
Bullshit or brilliant?
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Ok, you caught me! This post wasn't originally one of my Evolution series. It was written long before, and published in The Open Laboratory 2008. But it IS a post about evolution, and this week is all about evolution on Observations of a Nerd, so I say it counts!
It seems that you can't have a…
It seems that you can't have a conversation about evolution that doesn't end with everyone involved feeling frustrated. You can't even mention the word 'evolution' without bringing up a political philippic, religious rant or scientific squabble. Unfortunately, this keeps everyone from the…
* Friday Trivia: Who Said That? *
On Tuesday, I explained it's Hip to be Geek, but there's another side to the academic life that's more difficult... the moving part. Those of us pursuing the sciences have this pesky habit of skipping around the globe from one pursuit to the next driven by…
At last! Here is the much delayed Carnival of Evolution 48!
I must begin by apologizing for my tardiness, especially since John Wilkins managed to post the last one on time. I was traveling in the 2½ weeks preceding the deadline for CoE, and the combination of spotty internet access, extreme…
I'm more interested in another directed-human-evolution experiment: provide all women with complete control (contraception, abortion, etc) over their fertility so that they only give birth to the offspring of males they consider worthy of reproduction, and see what happens after a few hundred generations.
It is inevitable that genetic engineering will move forward despite the efforts of ethicists, moralists and theologians to restrain it. It is equally inevitable that some part of the human race will willingly opt for genetic modifications, artificial augmentation, and chemical enhancements for themselves and their offspring.
the question is not will it happen, but will it become the new "normal"
The answer depends on how much of an edge going neo can provide.
If you have the choice between giving your child the brain of Einstein and the athletic grace of Michael Jordan or take a chance that he/she will come out like the love child of Larry the Cable guy and Sally Kern, what would you choose?
In the above, feel free to replace Einstein and Michael Jordan with your preferred role models. There are numerous better examples, I just threw out a couple of names.
We all know this ends with Ricardo Montalbán cursing us all with his last breath.
I've got news for Mr. Fineberg. Completely stopping our evolution isn't an option. Not unless we achieve such mastery in genetic manipulation that we can prevent any new alleles from arising through mutation, as well as preventing any existing alleles from changing frequency in the human population.
Well, either that or if we go extinct.
There will be tries, but since there is no direct relationship between the genetic encoding and its expression in a somewhat complex primate I wonder how realistic those speculations are.
The ethics are rather against those trials unless we really know the exact relationship between coding and expression which we really at present have no clue of. Otherwise we might create non viable or suffering beings.
Neo-evolution will only result in the super-rich evolving for immortality, even if that involves a diet only of Soylent Green :-(