Quantum Levitation

My sister won the science fair with a "frictionless puck" using CO2, two jars, and two hockey pucks. This is not that:

More here.

More like this

Scientific Study Links Flammable Drinking Water to Fracking - ProPublica "The group tested 68 drinking water wells in the Marcellus and Utica shale drilling areas in northeastern Pennsylvania and southern New York State. Sixty of those wells were tested for dissolved gas. While most of the wells…
Liz and Celeste are on vacation, so we're re-posting some content from our old site. By Celeste Monforton, originally posted 11/4/09 I admit it: I have a soft spot for hockey players. It probably stems from my Michigan upbringing, including my family's winter-time ritual of making an outdoor…
SteelyKid has started to demand Sid the Science Kid videos, which of course we are implacably opposed to around here. One of the recent episodes available online was "Slide to the Side," talking about friction. While this partakes a bit of the Feynman "Energy makes it go" problem, it was generally…
Note: This is part of a two-part piece on the basics of canning (the whole thing in more refined form is contained in _Independence Days_ as well). In a previous post, I wrote about putting canning in perspective - it is not all of food preservation, nor is it essential. That said, however, I get…

Apparently this isn't the Meissner effect but something more subtle involving magnetic field lines getting "caught" in the superconductor. I don't really understand what this means. The physics seems more complicated than the usual Meissner effect. Sure is cool though.

I checked with Jim Kakalios on this just now (we were at an event) and this is a quantum phenomenon, according to him. Personally, I'm still thinking its fake, but what do I know?

The most amazing part:

Quantum Levitation

Posted on: October 20, 2011 10:05 AM, by Greg Laden

and we're commenting on the 19th. Take that, Einstein.

Mu: Yeah, that's because, just for fun, I wrote this post using those new extra-fast neutrinos.

i first saw this at a colloquium in the late 80's when high Tc superconductors were first discovered. pretty cool. (ha!)

it's been over 20 years, and there still is no good theory about how high Tc superconductors work. then again, it took over 40 years before BCS theory described ordinary superconductivity.

i still want a jetpack.

Even if it's fake, the technology they're using to fake it seems pretty amazing itself.

I've heard some controversy over whether or not it's actually "quantum," but that's kind of an afterthought as far as I'm concerned. If it works and it's replicable, they can call it what they please, so long as I get my freaking hover car.

The superconductor seems to stay superconducting for longer than I would expect. Anyone have info on the type or whether there are any other tricks to how they have kept it cool?

@ glen (#10)

To get the 'locking' effect they use a superconductor that is only 1 micron thick.

That means that most of the 'puck' can simply be thermal insulation - so even though most of the outer part of the puck will be approaching room temperature - but the inner section of 1 micron can still be nice and chilly.

That's my guess anyway.

Mac

at Mac #11: the "locking" effect if magnetic flux tubes getting pinned by defects in the crystal. when the superconductor superconducts, external magnetic fields are expelled. mostly. some get pinned, and cause the leveitation effect. this effect can happen with thicker crystals too. the first one i saw in the 80's was about 3/4" diameter and 1/4" thick. it could levitate and hang upside down from the pinned flux.