Not so fast …
- 85% of Americans want more funding for research renewable energy such as wind power.
- In Iowa, a state leading in wind energy production, 85% of voters view tax credits for wind production as positive.
- Also in Iowa, 57% of all voters would oppose a presidential candidate who wanted to end tax credits for wind energy, and 41% of GOP voters would oppose a Republican candidate who wanted to end tax credits for wind energy.
- During Romney’s overseas trip, his campaign announced that “He will allow the wind credit to expire, end the stimulus boondoggles, and create a level playing field on which all sources of energy can compete on their merits.”
Related Links:
- Republican Senator On Romney’s Anti-Wind Position: It Was ‘Like A Knife In My Back’
- Poll: Americans Support Strong Climate, Energy Policies
- In Iowa, Romney Blows Past His Record On Wind Energy
- Poll shows wind energy issue resonates in Iowa
______________________________
Photo by dannyakright
- Log in to post comments
More like this
The Sunday Washington Post leads with a story that greenhouse gas mitigation proposals in Congress are likely to stall, in part because several key lawmakers believe (or at least claim) that the public will not support the economic impacts associated with the proposals.
Michigan Democrat John…
I liked Obama's State of the Union Address, and I liked the fact that a lot of other people seemed to like it. He made strong and positive statements about energy.
Imagine what we could accomplish ... A future where we're in control of our own energy, and our security and prosperity aren't so…
We still aren't going to get a presidential debate devoted to science. So far, though,we have the Democratic nominee's elaborated responses to 14 questions put to him and his Republican counterpart by the Science Debate 2008 group. Here's two of Barack Obama's responses, with italicized annotation…
Despite the fact that the presidential candidates will not accept the invitation extended by Science Debate 2008 for a nationally broadcast science forum in May there is ample evidence to suggest that they should: A new poll ... a real poll .. indicates that 85% of US Adults agree that there should…
What bothers me Greg is that the more that Romney/Ryan and staff shoot themselves in the foot - and that's getting to be pretty much daily if not hourly - the more I'm left to wonder just what is it they know that the rest of us don't - which is to say - are they just saying whatever they really believe because they know come election day they already have it won due to various feats of skulduggery, and whatever they say now won't make any difference? Rumor has it the Koch brothers promised Romney 100M for his campaign if he chose Ryan. That's a lot of cash, no matter how rich you are, to be throwing at buffoons, whom in any moderately sane society shouldn't have a hope in hell of winning a federal election.
Nuclear energy alternatives aren't likely to get a level playing field regardless of who's in power (Liquid Flouride Throrium Reactors are a safe cheap alternative to oil). We can bitch and moan about liberals or conservatives being worse on energy but the fact of the matter is that the are both quite terrible.
Energy is one of the top priorities this country should have and energy independence hasn't made it into our top 10 priorities as a country. It's not a party issue it's and issue and the sooner we stop bickering and getting things done the better.
I have noted, various places, about smart (I think) wealthy people buying up wind rights and water rights. I have the idea that we are going to run out of water long before we run out of oil. Not going to run out of wind any time soon.
Ken, how does nuclear work as an alternative to oil? Can you use it to power your car?
Ken (and Windchaser)...
As always with a discussion of energy, it is very useful to draw a distinction between energy sources and fuels.
Nuclear power is an excellent alternative to coal & oil. Coal which is used for electricity and oil from which natural gas is used. I think Ken was talking about fast fission which in my opinion is the best alternative. Millions of years of clean energy and using nuclear waste from left over power plants. until fusion comes online.