Comment on the Next Generation Science Standards

From the NCSE:

The Next Generation Science Standards represent a tremendous opportunity to strengthen science education in the United States, but also a tremendous risk.

Dozens of states have signed up to consider replacing their existing standards with these new ones. NGSS could revolutionize the US science curriculum, doing great good if they live up to their promise: if evolution and climate change are covered accurately, if they are integrated throughout the curriculum and across grade levels, if the nature of science is presented honestly and incorporated throughout the curriculum, and if the standards are adopted widely by the states.

If the standards undercut or skimp on evolution and climate change, or inadvertently include language that can be abused by creationists or climate change deniers, they will pose a great danger to science education for decades to come.

The National Center for Science Education has been active throughout the review process, and the standards are nearly complete. The final public review is under way, and we need your help.

You can review the standards and leave your own comments for the drafters by visiting the NGSS website. That process can be technical and time-intensive, but there's another way to get involved.

By signing below, we'll be able to tell the drafters that you and many other concerned citizens stand behind our review, and will be ready to help implement those honest, thorough standards in their states.

We, the undersigned citizens, scientists, clergy, parents, students, and teachers, stand behind the principles represented by the National Center for Science Education's review of the Next Generation Science Standards.

In particular, we believe that state standards must:

treat evolution thoroughly – emphasizing tree thinking, the full range of evolutionary mechanisms, the many independent lines of evidence used in evolutionary research, and biodiversity and the history of life (including humans) – and presenting this information early and using it as the central organizing principle of the life sciences.
treat climate change thoroughly – including the dominant role humanity plays in modern climate change, the many ways that scientists test how and why the climate is changing, and the consequences of climate change for the natural world and our society – and presenting it as an organizing theme for study of the earth sciences.
give students sufficient context to understand not only the effects of climate change on society and natural systems, but also the solutions available through behavior change, technology, and engineering.
avoid claims about these and other socially contentious topics which are bad science or not science at all.
avoid language which could be twisted or misused by ideologues dedicated to undermining science education.
present the nature of science accurately and thoroughly, as a social enterprise, as a powerful process for testing claims about the natural world against empirical evidence, and the robust body of knowledge gained through that process.



More like this

The American Biology Teacher has hosted a guest editorial by Glenn Branch and Minda Berbeco of the NCSE. The editorial points out that climate science is under a similar sort of anti-science attack as evolution has been for years, though generally with different (less religious) motivations. Also…
There are now two competing curricula available for teaching about the bible in a public school elective course, the NCBCPS curriculum and the Bible Literacy Project. The former, you will recall, was thoroughly trashed by SMU religious studies professor Mark Chancey, whereupon the NCBCPS and their…
PBS has something coming out tonight about teaching climate change in American Classrooms. From a press release I just got in the mail: The PBS NEWSHOUR examines the struggle over teaching climate change Wednesday The PBS NewsHour's Hari Sreenivasan will report Wednesday (May 2) on how the…
Texas is gearing up to revise their state science standards. This is a big deal, because the standards Texas sets determine how textbooks are written not just for the Texas market, but for the rest of the nation. The fight over science standards now is a prelude to an imminent and much bigger…

The bottom link is bad, but the top link works, so sign from there!

Yes Ken,
You are right that the bottom link is bad.

It's late on Jan 28 and tomorrow is the last day to comment, so the NCSE website seems to be too jammed with traffic to get through. Keep trying.