Huxley's Brave New World

No, not that Huxley, the other Huxley. No, not that one either, the OTHER Huxley. OK, yeah, this one:

Brave New World

Aldous Huxley's profoundly important classic of world literature, Brave New World is a searching vision of an unequal, technologically-advanced future where humans are genetically bred, socially indoctrinated, and pharmaceutically anesthetized to passively uphold an authoritarian ruling order--all at the cost of our freedom, full humanity, and perhaps also our souls. “A genius [who] who spent his life decrying the onward march of the Machine” (The New Yorker), Huxley was a man of incomparable talents: equally an artist, a spiritual seeker, and one of history’s keenest observers of human nature and civilization. Brave New World, his masterpiece, has enthralled and terrified millions of readers, and retains its urgent relevance to this day as both a warning to be heeded as we head into tomorrow and as thought-provoking, satisfying work of literature. Written in the shadow of the rise of fascism during the 1930s, Brave New World likewise speaks to a 21st-century world dominated by mass-entertainment, technology, medicine and pharmaceuticals, the arts of persuasion, and the hidden influence of elites.


More like this

In Shakespeare's The Tempest, Act V scene 1, Miranda says O, wonder!How many goodly creatures are there here!How beauteous mankind is! O brave new world,That has such people in't! The third line gave Aldous Huxley the title of his future dystopia, Brave New World. Somewhere between Miranda's…
"The British are sniffy about sci-fi, but there is nothing artificial in its ability to convey apprehension about the universe and ourselves." Folks are always going on about Science Fiction in these parts. And that's fun. Figured I'd add a link to this essay, "Why don't we love science fiction…
...if he weren't a fucking moron. One of the books that has gone missing in all of the criticisms of Jonah Goldberg's ridiculous Democrat-bashing screed Liberal Fascism is Wolfgang's Schivelbusch's Three New Deals: Reflections on Roosevelt's America, Mussolini's Italy, and Hitler's Germany, 1933-…
This is old news, but in 1998 Random House generated one of those "100 Best Novels" lists as voted by a panel and by readers. Interestingly there was quite the disconnect between what both groups favored: The Board’s Top 5 ULYSSES by James Joyce THE GREAT GATSBY by F. Scott Fitzgerald A PORTRAIT OF…

How did tomorrow's histories get written as last year's works of fiction???

By Brainstorms (not verified) on 16 Feb 2017 #permalink

And let's not forget Ape and Essence, my personal favorite.

“The leech's kiss, the squid's embrace,
The prurient ape's defiling touch:
And do you like the human race?
No, not much.”

By Kevin O'Neill (not verified) on 16 Feb 2017 #permalink

What Huxleys are you referring to? There is Demolition Man which is an homage to this Huxley, Sandra Bullock plays Lenina Huxley.

Kevin -- It says something when the Nobel prize winner in the family is less famous than his two half-brothers.

I did look them up, but I didn't know if that's what he meant.

I just re-read Brave New World recently and I did NOT find it horrifying. The baby factories were horrible, but the rest of the world seemed a pretty decent place. And if you were the type to find it uncomfortable, they didn't kill you, they sent you some where you could be a little less bothered by the extremes and live your life.

If we could substitute robots for the genetically modified lower classes, I'm not sure I would mind living there.

By Walt Garage (not verified) on 19 Feb 2017 #permalink