1. illconsidered
  2. Roger shows paleontologists are no better than climatologists

Roger shows paleontologists are no better than climatologists

By illconsidered on February 7, 2009.

So last week I asked "how low", Things Break provided an answer, and Roger continued his love-to-hate realtionship with Real Climate folks. The sopa opera continues, spilling out into Real Life, as Gavin seems to want some formal retraction. Being called a thief is no small matter, and like most of Rogers conclusions, this is just not born out by the evidence. He is once again finding the smallest bit of wiggle room and prying it open until it is wide enough for his ego to fit through!

(And BTW, none of this matters if you are interested in what is actually going on in Antarctica.)

But here is the big news, the point of posting: while that tempest was overflowing its teapot, Roger has turned his sites to the field of paleontolgy and uncovers shocking evidence of Dr Ross Geller using the same underhanded logic as Gavin to claim credit for his friend Joey's plan!

See the evidence for yourself here:

Shocking! Is Roger the only one in this arena with any ethics?

Tags
humour
climate change
friends
gavin schmidt
Joey
pielke jr
ross

More like this

Wegman scandal: GMU investigates
Dan Vergano in USA Today reports: Officials at George Mason University confirmed Thursday that they are investigating plagiarism and misconduct charges made against a noted climate science critic. "I'm very well aware of the report, but I have been asked by the university not to comment until all…
Pearcegate
Fred Pearce is going down the David Rose road publishing fabricated quotes. Gavin Schmidt in a letter to New Scientist (so far unpublished there) writes: In the piece entitled "Climate sceptics and scientists attempt peace deal" Fred Pearce includes a statement about me that is patently untrue. "…
Legal and scientific burdens of proof, and scientific discourse as public controversy: more thoughts on Chandok v. Klessig.
As promised, I've been thinking about the details of Chandok v. Klessig. To recap, we have a case where a postdoc (Meena Chandok) generated some exciting scientific findings. She and her supervisor (Daniel F. Klessig), along with some coworkers, published those findings. Then, in the fullness of…
Hey JC, JC, that's not alright by me
I am a skeptic. Not a climate skeptic, not in the sense of the improperly commandeered word we use in the climate debates. In my experience they know little of real skepticism as a general rule. But me, I really do dislike taking assertions on their face if I don't have all the facts and I really…