His Noodliness walks (or flies) among us, and here's the evidence.
Hey, it's better than any "evidence" that I've seen supporting the existence of UFO's or ghosts.
More like this
A study in Neurology came out today ($ required) that found that those with better reading skills had 2.5 times less cognitive brain damage due to lead! Reading ability is one of the best ways to measure cognitive reserve (CR), the ability to maintain good cognitive performance despite disease or…
Mark H at the Denialism blog asks if a story on CNN's website about how to get rid of ghosts in your house is a joke. Turns out the original story is from the online version of This Old House magazine (to which I subscribe, living as I do in an old house in need of renovations.) And considering how…
Even here at the ASCO meeting, I couldn't help but be made aware (thanks to Steve Novella and others) about a brand-spanking new video of a supposed encounter with an alien that--unlike all the other dubious videos of alleged alien encounters--according to its maker will really and truly convince…
I came across this comment from Lenny Flank about one of Hugh Ross' recent books and I thought I'd post it. Let me make clear up front that I have not read the book in question, so I can only go by Lenny's account of what it says. If that is accurate, I think it gives a pretty good idea of what…
That is one of the funniest and coolest things I've seen on the Net. Whoever put that together deserves an Academy Award.
Awesome link!!!
I don't really intend to derail any spaghetti monster discussion here, but I'd like to make a quick point in response to your dig at convincing UFO evidence.
There is a huge amount of evidence that supports the existence of UFOs. Besides things like radar tracking data, photographs and films, there is the even more important category of eyewitness accounts. And while it's very easy to discount sightings by the Average (or Below Average!) Joe, only a fool would dismiss reports from astronauts, pilots, scientists, generals, presidents, and other intelligent, informed, reasonable people.
UFO reports from astronauts, pilots and aerospace/atmospheric scientists are particularly interesting, because these individuals are often trained in observation and critical thinking and are usually pretty familiar with the various esoteric phenomena of the heavens that UFOs are so often ascribed to.
There's nothing pseudoscientific about pointing out that years of accumulated evidence from scores of highly-qualified observers indicate that there are things occurring in our atmosphere that we cannot remotely explain.
Now, that being said, I would agree with you if you had stated that there isn't excellent, unassailable evidence that UFOs are in fact extraterrestrial spacecraft. But to simply state that there isn't evidence that the phenomenon of UFO sightings is real is blatantly wrong, as is the idea that every documented case has an easy scientific explanation.
Lee -
For sure there some things that we see in the sky that are unidentified. However, the vast majority of objects at first unidentified are later identified as something completly mundane. The vast majority of photos or videos are either mundane objects or outright fakes. In those that are not, its unclear as to what the object even is.
However there is a great deal of difference between seeing something in the sky that we can't explain, and saying it's an extraterrestrial craft. There is little in the way of evidence for the later. No alien bodies or clear unambiguous photos or bits of wreckage. Personal accounts, even by professionals, may have many other and more plausible explanations.
Dave,
Yes, the vast majority of objects initially unidentified are later found to have mundane explanations. Yes, the vast majority of photos/videos also have mundane explanations or are fakes. As you said, "In those that are not, its unclear as to what the object even is."
That means those remaining instances are unidentified flying objects, no? All I'm saying is, it's silly to dismiss the personal accounts from well-qualified observers for lack of a simple plausible explanation. It's better to just admit that we don't know what the hell these well-qualified people saw and we can't adequately explain it. Hence the term UFO.
We're on the same wavelength, really. Notice that I too made the point that there isn't sufficient evidence to label UFOs as extraterrestrial spacecraft.
I generally dismiss them because they're eyewitness accounts. The source has little bearing on it.
This should win a lot of converts to Pastafarianism.
Lee,
Although I see your point, that's reading a lot into a quick one-off post that was meant as nothing more than a bit of humor.
Orac,
You're right - apologies for the threadjack. Sometimes I let my contrarian nature get the best of me!
Lee said:
Agreed.
For your viewing pleasure!
http://jesusjustforyou.blogspot.com/
Sorry, JesusMarine, something is wrong with your blog. It only had a silly paragraph explaining the beginning of the world as "God did it" and no promised image. Try harder next time.