With the appearance of the Hitler Zombie twice in less than a month on this blog, Andrew Mathis was inspired to send me this YouTube video. He's right; it's perhaps the best commentary I've heard about the use of the Hitler analogy or argumentum ad Nazium to demonize one's political opponents.
More like this
This is a fascinating article about Hitler's library: he was an avid collector and reader, and part of his collection still exists, and you can even stroll down to the Library of Congress and ask to browse through the stockpi
tags: Downfall, Even Hitler Made a Hitler Parody,
I'm not going to comment too much on this, but this is hilariously wrong.
Nasal drone Ben Stein, as you would be hard-pressed not to know if you are a regular reader of ScienceBlogs, is hosting what looks to be a truly execrable crap-fest called Expelled!: No Intelligence Allowed.
I believe you've achieved Godwin's rule in the opening post. That will make for a short thread.
That was hilarious
Dear Wamba:
I suggest that you spend some time learning about the context of Godwin's Law. Note that it requires a Hitler comparison as a form of debate. Thus, Orac's comment is not even close.
BTW, here is a link to the original post of Mike Godwin:
http://tinyurl.com/f57e7
Dear TheProbe: Medical science is making wonderful advances. I suggest you look into getting a humour implant.
TheProbe does have a sense a humor... he did laugh at my joke. (and NO!, I am not going to send him a replacement keyboard because of something I posted on misc.health.alternative.)... he is just particular on the use of Godwin (something I always goof up).
:)
If I might be forgiven a blatant post-pimp, the subject of my latest post makes a particularly credulous use of Godwin's Law (see referenced PDF for details).
Kev,
Oh, I've seen your latest article. Ayoub is truly a loon. David Icke, anyone?
The video's vanished from YouTube, but there's a playable version here:
http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0605/jon_stewart_holo.php3