Best anti-homeopathy poster ever?

You be the judge!

i-92a672cd86da55e00adcceb730bdb501-Homeopathy.jpg

Clicking on the picture will lead you to a blog post where you can download a high resolution version suitable for printing up and either distributing or putting up on a bulletin board or wall. I particularly like that it was made by The American Institute for the Destruction of Tooth Fairy Science.

My only objection to the poster is the use of the word "shit." Don't get me wrong here. Yes, it's accurate. Yes, it's appropriate. No, I'm not some sort of prude who never uses the word and wilts at the very sight or sound of it. My problem with it is that its inclusion on the image means that I can't actually print up and post this beautiful (and brief) mockery of homeopathy on my lab door or on the bulletin board in my office. I can't put something like that up in public at work. So I started thinking of alternatives that get the message across but without any curse words.

How about something like:

If water has a memory, then homeopathy is full of crap

Homeopathy: Potentized poo in sugar.



Yes, I do watch Dirty Jobs a lot, with its host, Mike Rowe, who likes to use the word "poo" a lot. Come to think of it, perhaps Mike Rowe should do a segment of Dirty Jobs segment at a manufacturer of homeopathic remedies. Why? Think of the potentized poo!

Come to think of it, we skeptics need to be doing more of this sort of thing: Getting the message across in pithy, well-designed illustrations that can be put on posters, flyers, and such. If anyone out there has mad Photoshop or Illustrator skillz, a skeptical mind, and a warped sense of humor, let's see what you can do! Send me your illustrations, and I'll post them, along with credit and a link to your blog. My only requirements is that they be skeptical and suitable for posting virtually anywhere.

More like this

Today, April 10, is the first day of World Homeopathy Awareness Week (WHAW), or, as I like to call it, World Sympathetic Magic Awareness Week. Now, given my dim view of homeopathy, in which I view it as nothing more than, well, sympathetic magic, you'd think I wouldn't want people to pay attention…
Have a diet rich in fiber? Eating bamboo all day, everyday, means pandas most certainly do. Now, researchers at a giant panda reserve in southern China are looking for paper mills to process their panda's fiber rich poo! The center's 40 bamboo-fed pandas produce about 2 tons of "processed material…
Over the years I’ve been studying science versus pseudoscience, medicine vs. quackery, reason versus crankery, I’ve noticed one thing. The cranks, pseudoscientists, and quacks of the world have a hard time dealing with legitimate criticism. Now, I know I sometimes get a bit—shall we say?—frisky…
It looks as though at least a couple of my readers have taken to heart my suggestion that, if the pro-CAM, "no skeptics need apply" new wikipedia known as Wiki4CAM won't allow any scientific evidence to be posted within its pages if it does not support the CAM therapy being discussed, then perhaps…

if mother nature has a memory to remind every thing then every natural things has his own memory. Nature can solve all the effects of won. so we are not out of nature or any kinds of treatment belong to natural safety or where natural safety or real treatment can solve all effects of human or natural every thing. Not only Alopathy can solve human remedies problems there are may ways of nature treatment only they knows who are with nature or knows practically.By the way I love homeopathy. or I have lots of prove to cure bad remedies of human living life. homeopathy believe there in an unknown power in universe what only comes in human mind by practicing medicine providing accurately. Mother nature may helps human for living his raise so long.
ps.our Baul Tagure says Fifth Aliment has is own power or he is also like alive just living creature.

Dr.Pranesh Baul
Baulbai,Baulpara
Narsingdi 1600
Bangladesh.
Mobile. 0088 01711611797

By Dr.Prnesh Baul (not verified) on 20 May 2012 #permalink

As an uneducated Nortern Barbarian (from Norway, that is, where swearwords are not made much a deal of), may I ask what the big difference between "shit" and "crap" is? Both are fairly crude, no? Why is one not okay and the other is? Puzzling!

Poo is a good word, though. Has a nice ring to it. Poo. Poo. POO! And I love the poster <3

Hahahaha that poster is amazing.

Caro, it is one of the oddities of American culture. You can have ten words describing the same thing, and nine words are permitted and the other one isn't. They're all describing the same thing so what the hell is the difference?

This is especially true for Orac's example of Dirty Jobs, where the host has literally shoveled shit. It is right there on TV in all it's HIDEF glory but he has to say poo. Just hearing the word is too offensive but seeing it is OK. They also, amusingly, scramble the visual of crew members vomiting but don't censor (as far as I can recall) images of manually inseminating cows, for example. I don't know how discovery network's standards and practices people make their decisions :P

Personally, I like the way Mike Rowe uses the term "poo." It's mellifluous. It somehow fits, and it often makes me laugh in a way that, even if it were allowed, saying "shit" wouldn't.

Ok so I had to look up mellifluous. I'll agree that there is a certain entertainment value to the use of "poo" while using a hose to water down the piled up, dessicated shit that's blocking the door to the broken pump in the sewage treatment plant. Followed by the hydrogen sulfide alarm going off and them running away before they die.

Howzabout "If water has memory, then homeopathy is excretiable"??

By Chas, PE SE (not verified) on 08 Apr 2009 #permalink

This poster was so funny, I believe I pooed myself. BTW, poster was printed and now placed on my office door. Someone will complain I'm sure. I'll survive.

To our Norwegian friend, our country just has a hang-up about scatological humor. American males are particularly fond of it.

Any copyright issues to worry about if you save it, then photoshop the offending word out and put in a word of your choice? e.g. crap, poo. That won't be hard to do at all...in fact, I'm going to do it so I can post it in public places.

By Daniel J. Andrews (not verified) on 08 Apr 2009 #permalink

But it's fine that it has the memory of excrement and any nasty you like: E. coli, C. diff, VRE, S. typhinus, V. cholerae. Because that 30X dilution of a toxin or pathogen is the remedy for the toxin or pathogen.

Your local tap water cures everything.

"They also, amusingly, scramble the visual of crew members vomiting but don't censor (as far as I can recall) images of manually inseminating cows, for example."

The most egregious example I can remember was on the horse breeding episode. They blurred out the genitalia of the stallion when Mike was collecting the semen, but when he stuck his arm up the mare's vagina to inseminate her (and later, up another mare's vagina to transfer an embryo into the surrogate's womb), that was not blurred. I guess female animal genitalia are okay, but male genitalia are holy-freakin-heck-that's-obscene!

It also amuses me that the film crew takes the time to lovingly film other crew members vomiting. They obviously greatly enjoy embarrassing one another. ;-)

By Calli Arcale (not verified) on 08 Apr 2009 #permalink

"They blurred out the genitalia of the stallion when Mike was collecting the semen"

Didn't want to give male viewers an inferiority complex?

By Tsu Dho Nimh (not verified) on 08 Apr 2009 #permalink

Well, you could have a Norman Rockwell type picture of a handful of little kids all decked out in silly gear like flippers and goggles and snorkels and masks and enormous towels and silly-looking bathing suits, playing on and around a dock on a lake, or in the spray of a fire hydrant, or in a bathtub, or with hoses and sprinklers, or whatever, and have the slogan "If water has a memory, then homeopathy is plain goofy."

Not nearly as good, but appropriate for a wider audience.

Or just white out the word. It's not like there's anyone who won't fill in the blank themselves.

By D. C. Sessions (not verified) on 08 Apr 2009 #permalink

Instead of Full of Poo, you might try Full of Woo.

Homeopathy is distilled diarrhea.

Homeopathy - You may pretend it has a memory, but you don't want to know where it's been.

Homeopathy - Flush it with the rest of the unmentionables.

I definitely favor the "If water has a memory, then homeopathy is full of crap" version, because a person doesn't have to know much about homeopathy to understand it, so it will get the message across better. I only wish I had a nice printer so I could hang this on my wall!

Here are some graphics from our Blog:

the antivaccionist(Homo microcerebrus):
http://blog.esowatch.com/media/3/20090225-microcerebrum.jpg

an antivaccionist (Petek-Dimmer):
http://blog.esowatch.com/media/3/20081124-peteck-dimmer2.jpg

Matthias Rath:
http://blog.esowatch.com/media/3/20081019-rath.jpg

an UFO flying over the anthroposophic Goetheanum:
http://blog.esowatch.com/media/1/20081118-Goetheanum.jpg

a customized cover of a magazin about CAM:
http://blog.esowatch.com/media/3/20081119-geo_wissen1b.jpg

And this beautiful one was for celebration of Darwins birthday:
http://blog.esowatch.com/media/16/20090205-darwin.jpg

About a month ago I commented to my wife:

"If homeopathy is true, I'm never going swimming again."

Put that text onto a pic of a crowded swimming pool...

Fear not, cleaner crap and poo versions are forthcoming. I just figured I'd put out the intercooled, turbo V-12 version first. The Institute will be releasing more in the series.

While the inability to post it publicly is certainly problematic, I find a certain elegance to the slogan, probably deriving from the alliteration in "Shit and Sugar."

"Poo" is good, too, though. I am also an avid watcher of Mike Rowe (among the coolest guys ever to live, I am convinced), and have as a consequence found myself saying "poo" more often than I ever did before.

Great poster (in both senses - both Orac and Pareidolius).

Having been pointed to the Hell's News Stand by Orac in a previous post (the reference to "Medical Wackaloon Monthly") I have the honour of being the first follower of Pareidolius.

(Now I need to be careful here but I seem to recall that Pareidolius is a she (so apologies if I got this wrong - I am just trying to be polite))

She did point out that the font is "Franklin Gothic Extra Condensed" should you wish to sanitise the poster for more delicate souls.

She also asked that if you change the poster drastically that you:

"""1) Please don't credit me since it will no longer be mine and . . .
2) Don't include the Institute logo on the bottom."""

In England you could use "shite" which is more acceptable than "shit", probably in the same way that "bullshit" is more acceptable than "shit" elsewhere. (How on earth does that work ? Funny species aren't we ?).

you guys are so ignorant like your orac and randi. homeopathy is a great science and it is doing wonders around the globe in treating patients.

By nisha singh (not verified) on 09 Apr 2009 #permalink

you guys are so ignorant like your orac and randi. homeopathy is a great science and it is doing wonders around the globe in treating patients

Says the person who thinks shitwater is good for what ails you.

You've forgotten about the magic ingredient in homeopathic shit: succussion (is that how you spell it?).

The quacks might come back with their own counter- slogan: "Homeopathic shit: shaken, not stirred".

By Swiftsure (not verified) on 09 Apr 2009 #permalink

Nisha

What an eviscerating comment. We are well and truly put in our places by the depth of your scientific analysis. Your coruscating critique leaves us stunned into silence.

I would expect nothing else from someone, one of whose (presumed) political heroes regularly drank his own urine. Maybe the poster is therefore totally correct.

You are what you eat/drink. You presumably live on a diet of air, sugar pills and piss, which is reflected in your vacuous drivel.

Swiftsure, you beat me to it. I was going to say that woo-likers will defend themselves by saying that toilet water wasn't pounded on a magical rubber mat, so it won't remember the poo.

I'm not sure that there's a whole lot of difference between shaking and flushing. Probably interchangeable. :) I'd put up a poster with "crap" in lieu of sh*t.

Well, I'm pretty sure raw sewage does quite a bit of sloshing about before it reaches a water treatment plant. At least the equivalent of 10 taps on a leather bible. Multiple times. If succussion truly potentizes water (which it doesn't), your sewage would definitely be homeopathic by the time it's getting cleaned.

For what it's worth though, if you dumped a 1 kilo bag of suger into the ocean somewhere, after an even distribution across the globe, the amount of sugar molecules still found in one liter of water one year later would still be higher than what you would find after a 10C dilution.

Since it's more likely for the water to "remember" something it's still carrying than something that's already long gone, you decide which is going to be the stronger remedy/antidote.

I also dare any homeopatists to refute my claims with actual science or results from reputable scientific studies ...

I'd keep the image, but change the text to "Does water have a memory? I do hope NOT! Homeopathy: Sugar and Sewage"

Sewage may get beaten and sloshed a lot, but it's not done against a magical rubber mat.

But if all water does have poo memory, isn't that supposed to protect us from poo? I wonder how that works. Does it make us not have to poo anymore?

I never understood why homeos could believe the 'water memory" bit, yet not consider that the consequence is that so much water would then be full of, not only shit, but every vitamin, heavy metal, alcohol, spoiled milk, and so many other substances commonly flushed down toilets. So everybody downstream of my septic system ought to be healthy as a horse!

I've just had a thought: we accuse homeopaths of talking shit; could they now accuse us of the same? Erm...

How about this: if each skeptic grabbed a homeopath and gave him or her a damned good succussion, would that increase or decrease their potency?

By Swiftsure (not verified) on 09 Apr 2009 #permalink

you guys are so ignorant like your orac and randi. homeopathy is a great science and it is doing wonders around the globe in treating patients.

It's funny how you drag Mr. Randi into this. Why? Do you think he has anything to do with his site? Or are you just bitter about how thoroughly he's discredited homeopathy?

By Joseph C. (not verified) on 09 Apr 2009 #permalink

Could I get that on a T-shirt?

By TexasSkeptic (not verified) on 09 Apr 2009 #permalink

you guys are all dumbos who knows nothing but just talk rubbish. i think you are paid for this. I included randi orac because they symbolizes people like you who are so scared of homeopathy and other systems of treatment. you guys know nothing about health and sickness. what all you can do is talk bullshit. thats what your minds are. this is confirmed by millions of people getting good health from homeopathy. idiots like you talk and eat bullshit and when fall sick silently go to homeopaths to get treatment.

By nisha singh (not verified) on 09 Apr 2009 #permalink

you guys are all dumbos who knows nothing but just talk rubbish. i think you are paid for this. I included randi orac because they symbolizes people like you who are so scared of homeopathy and other systems of treatment. you guys know nothing about health and sickness. what all you can do is talk bullshit. thats what your minds are. this is confirmed by millions of people getting good health from homeopathy.

dumbos?

You hear that Orac? All those years in medical school and residency mean bupkis. You don't know anything about health or sickness.

idiots like you talk and eat bullshit and when fall sick silently go to homeopaths to get treatment.

Again, says the person who thinks shitwater is good for what ails you.

I've never been to a homeopath unless you include buying a bottle of water at the gas station.

I'm thinking this is the woo version of Poe's law in action here.

Aw, man, Photobucket shrunk it. Dunno what to do about that.

That is awesome, Pareidolius. Now if I can just get some of my family members to understand it.

@ Schwa - Aw, man, Photobucket shrunk it. Dunno what to do about that.

You could put a full size one up on any number of file sharing sites - rapidshare, megaupload, etc. I think flickr will also host large images, you just have to click through a bit to get to them. Also, Pareidolius requested that altered posters have the seal removed.

By Brachyteles (not verified) on 10 Apr 2009 #permalink

Nisha Singh comments:

"you [sic] guys know nothing about health and sickness."

You, on the other hand, know nothing about capital letters. Look to the sides of your keyboard - the keys marked "shift", when depressed, allow you to type capital letters. Every sentence should begin with one.

"idiots [sic] like you talk and eat bullshit and when fall sick silently go to homeopaths to get treatment."

Wrong on all counts, Nisha Singh. Homeopaths, on the other hand, talk bullshit, sell bullshit and when they get sick, quietly go to real doctors. So will you, if you get a real disease that isn't self-limited. Or you'll die. Either way, your outlook on health care will be permanently altered.

Good luck with that.

Prometheus

Go easy on poor Nisha Singh--you probably can't speak his native tongue as well as he speaks English. And give him a chance; no doubt his next comment will include references to clinical trials published in peer-reviewed journals that report on the efficacy of homeopathy, as well as its mechanisms.

no i will not write about research in homeopathy. net is full of that including double blind trials and metaanalysis. i know you guys know that homeopathy and others like acupuncture ayurveda are all effective and helping millions around the globe. i know that you are also aware how conventional medicine is not capable to give complete health solutions specially the medicinal treatment because surgery is not medicine. that poster is true reflection of your minds. all shit. the good point is that people are free to choose what is good for them that is why despite all attemps by pharmaceutical companies to kill homeopathy and other holistic sciences these are growing all over the world. people know that your dirty thoughts are not going to give them relief from suffering. when your child suffer and shrieks in pain give him or her your shit thoughts. and those who use homeopathy change their minds forever (rather clean their minds forever).

By nisha singh (not verified) on 10 Apr 2009 #permalink

Nisha Singh wrote "no i will not write about research in homeopathy."

Because real research shows it does not work.

All it the research that shows it "works" is hand waving over teeny tiny studies going ballistic over teeny tiny changes with spurious symptoms.

BUT... if you ask about real diseases, that is a different story. One goof-ball homeopath claims that homeopathy works better than real medicine for rabies. Rabies is pretty much 99% fatal, so showing that homeopathy works better should be easy. Get some mice, vaccinate half of them for rabies and then inject all of them with rabies. Then treat the half that was not vaccinated for rabies with homeopathy.

Which group do you think will survive?

Come on, Nisha, tell us! Give us the data, and evidence that homeopathy works on rabies! That it works for type 1 diabetes! That it works for syphilis (you know that is one of the "miasms", right?)!

Stop with the insults and give us evidence.

mark said "And give him a chance; no doubt his next comment will include references to clinical trials published in peer-reviewed journals that report on the efficacy of homeopathy, as well as its mechanisms"

Um, nope, that did not happen. It was just a string of random statements including: "people know that your dirty thoughts are not going to give them relief from suffering."

Oooh, asking for evidence is considered a "dirty thought!"

Like the central message. For the secondary message, instead of "homeopathy is execrable pseudoscience" (NB spelling!) or similar, could I suggest:

"Homeopathy: selling magic water to the gullible since 1807"

or perhaps:

Homeopathy: "magic water" + gullibility = $$$

PS 1807 was the year that Hahnemann first specifically used the term homeopathy, though he had started expounding the concepts several years earlier.

Not to poke fun at a tragedy but rather at homeopathy.

Homeopathy: Head to Italy for tap water that cures tremors.

Just wondering: If a water molecule is taken apart and put back together again, does it still remember?

/fake stupidity.

Okay, no, really...if homeopathy worked, then spring water would be the best of cures. Unless it remembers the BPA junk in the plastic bottle..

By Nightshadequeen (not verified) on 12 Apr 2009 #permalink

cohen: The Dalai Lama repeatedly says you need to use the best, most scientifically proven medicine availiable. So while he's not come out againist traditional Tibetan medicine because he believes it's better than no treatment at all (maybe some of it is), he definitely is of the mind that if you can chose between traditional medicine and scientifically proven medicine such as is found in the West, you should go with the Western medicine.

Don't lump him in with homeopaths.

By Basiorana (not verified) on 13 Apr 2009 #permalink

one question plz. Why do all diseases run into 'remission' under (zero molecule) homeopathic medication? I treated a patient (Citizen of USA) who for last five years had taken huge quantity of (Molecular) 'evidence' based medicines, innumerable courses of antibiotics, multiple surgeries but alas his sinusitis was not impressed. But under (zero molecule) homeopathic medication within a month his sinusitis ran into remission. This is one of millions of cases. I agree with you guys it can't be because of any medicine effect as there are no molecules but why all these diseases get into 'remission'.

By nisha singh (not verified) on 23 Apr 2009 #permalink

And not only diseases getting better. One patient again from USA was diagnosed with oligospermia. Couple was depressed.Again loads of (molecular) medicines for more than seven years but his sperm count could never improve. And under homeopathic (zero molecule) treatment in one month his counts started getting better and 3rd month his counts got positive and wife conceived. Take more. One US doctor (yes MD doctor) suffering from sarcoidosis was fast becoming emaciated, coughing day and night. As always loads of (molecular) medicines but result nil. He came for treatment. Even steroids were not helping.I told him that there are no molecules in homeopathic medicines. He said I am willing to eat zero molecule medicine even if with memory of shit because all I want is relief. I said OK, gave (zero molecule) medicine and his cough along with sarcoidosis got better (proved by investigations). Why should diseases get scared by (zero molecule) homeopathic WATER with memory of shit.

By nisha singh (not verified) on 28 Apr 2009 #permalink

@60 & 61 nisha singh,

If these things really are happening, why does homeopathy always fail when scientists are observing?

The same as any other fraud, when you watch closely enough, the fraud is observed.

whats going on. all silent. sleeping or posing to be asleep.

By Nisha Singh (not verified) on 14 Sep 2009 #permalink
By Nisha Singh (not verified) on 16 Sep 2009 #permalink

Hello Friend,
I would like to tell you my story. On 7th Jan 2008 While doing exercise in Gym my epididmytics (cord in testicle, where sperm stored) get streched and it get swollen to 5 times the normal size and I was on bed for 3 days. I had taken generation 3 level antibiotics, anti-inflamation, pan killers and vitamin capsules all suggested by MD doctor (well know in our locality). Swelling was gone in 3 weeks and i was back on track but again when I resume exercise after 2 months, same thing happen. This continued for about 1 year and belive me that time was like going through hell. You don't fell like doing any thing.
Then I consult BHMS (Homepathic doctor), he asked me several question, which were annoying, but later he told me that in homepathy we judge the type of personality for each indiviual. And he gave me one homepathic medicine and believe me even I was amazed at the result. My swelling gone in 3 weeks, I start felling good about life and I fully recover in 3 months. Today 9 oct 2009, I am completey fine. Not only my epididmytics problem get well, I was having some back pain I also get a great refief from that.
Now I am so impressed with these medicine that My kids, wife and all family members also start switching to homeopathic medicines.
Regards
Jan Sammel

By Jan Sammel- India (not verified) on 08 Oct 2009 #permalink

Good Job! Dr Nisha..

I appreciate your contribution.

The world just needs to understand one thing... humans are not super-humans... even Einstein, the most intelligent human of the last century strove to explain mysteries as he believed there was a lot more to this universe than what a human eye can see, human ear can hear, human skin can touch or a human mind can perceive.

For something as non-material and universal as an energy, no material human-made instruments or experiments suffice to explain the existence or working of, but that does not change the fact that it does exist. Universe is not waiting for us potentially restricted "Humans" to understand or not understand something.

For people who do understand, nature welcomes them with open arms and offers solutions to their problems...in a very subtle way.

To make use it of it and apply it to the well-being of our fellow-humans is left to us.

This truth was perceived by all the healers who offer nature and its powers to healing sick.

'Real' diseases will always remain 'Real'. 'Real' humans (read 'common man') will seek 'Real' remedies (read 'readily available, easily explained and understood and not too difficult to apply') and the side-effects and the harm done then can be easily ignored.

The fact does not change whether or not you are able to prove how it works.

Scientists are still struggling to 'explain' millions of facts of universe, let them do their job... we are here to observe nature, and accept its gifts, humbly and honestly.

Dr Nisha has given ample evidence of what homeoapthy is all about and how it has helped millions of people around the globe, and no matter what people say about it, it will turn out to be the leading mode of therapy all over the world, unless people prefer to remain ignorant and thrive on pharma company's mercies.

Good Luck!

Homeopathic remedies saved my life! To all those who don't believe it then just continue to take all that toxic synthetic shit that doesn't cure but makes the evil ones rich and laughing all the way to the bank. FOOLS!

Prove it.

And of course, no medicine ever came from a natural source, or was originally found in a natural source. It is all synthetic. I am curious if MP feels that synthetically derived, natural compounds are dangerous. I can also think of a few natural and rather toxic substances.

Manufacturers of homeopathic medicine give it away for free now? I would think that one might be able to describe people who sell water for exorbitant prices might laugh all the way to the bank as well.

FYI.. REAL homeopathic medicine is NOT just use of herbs etc for effect of the mind..
Inform yourself and simply google some illness and you will find homeopathic treatments for illnesses .. and they are legitatiment.. Also a top homeopathic doctor can diagnose you from observation and talking to the patient.. few homeopathic doctors are at this level...
ignorance from missinformation on what homeopathic really is IS amazing.. its not what most think AT ALL...

By Mark Panegos (not verified) on 13 Aug 2010 #permalink

Mark Panegos:

FYI.. REAL homeopathic medicine is NOT just use of herbs etc for effect of the mind..

Well, that is true. Especially when Nat Mur is based on table salt.

Why should we google anything? Why don't you tell us exactly how effective with evidence homeopathy is against bacterial infections, Type 1 diabetes, rabies and a whole list of of non-self-limiting conditions.

Bet you won't. Because for homeopathy, there is nothing in it!

Umm, Mark, finding "treatments" for an illness using a google search does not mean those treatments actually work. Or that they can diagnose anything. You make claims but have backed them up with nothing.

I am curious, what do you think most of us think homeopathy is? I have a feeling you might have the wrong idea.

@65
i just read the first one "Qualitative systemic review of randomized controlled trials..."
And you really are a MORON.
The abstract explains that the 'good' results are well below statistical significance!!!!!!!!!!
One group 'feeling' better by placebo effect, or a subject by simply finishing with the illness naturally, gives the numbers quoted.
"The average methodological quality of the identified studies was fairly low" - this is high-brow language, which i'll translate for you: "the methods used were shite!"
PS. i see someone called you Dr. i get those spam emails aswell.

I am what you would call an "allopath" and I personally am very skeptical of Homeopathy. Having said that, I'd also like to point out that being primarily a scientifically minded person, I would like to believe that homeopathy works, PROVIDED I am given UNQUESTIONABLE proof that it works.
Many of you don't realize why "It worked on me" is not proof enough and neither is "It didn't work on me". Since many of you are not able top grasp the validity of this, I would like to elaborate.
The human body is such a complex system that we don't yet know everything about it. Which is why when something sometimes UNEXPECTEDLY works or UNEXPECTEDLY doesn't work, it can be due to factors not entirely known to us and hence cannot be taken to be a proof of effectiveness or ineffectiveness, respectively. However, when you observe in large groups of RANDOMLY selected people, the unknowns get cancelled out and a more accurate picture is obtained. This is a statistical approach which is perfectly scientific and fits in well with theories AND practical applications in ALL branches of science.
To give an example, the sahara dessert is an arid area where it hardly ever rains. If you were to go there on a day when out of sheer chance it rained, would you then conclude that it almost always rains in the sahara dessert? Not really. Similar is the case with proof of effectiveness. This is precisely why anecdotal evidence is not accepted. This is why the calls for larger, randomized trials for proof. These, so far have not proven the effectiveness of homeopathy UNQUESTIONABLY.

By Dr. Harshit (not verified) on 25 Aug 2011 #permalink

Another bit of jargon which is confused by many is the placebo effect. The placebo effect is the SUBJECTIVE feeling of improvement which is entirely psychological. Don't get me wrong. It is not mumbo jumbo. On the contrary, it is a very powerful effect by itself because there always is a psychological component to a patient's condition if only as a reaction to the disease. Any patient who is given something being told that it is a medicine will believe in it and will Subjectively express an improvement (barring the occasional hypochondriacs). But, when we are giving a specific drug, we want it to have an effect besides the placebo effect.
"Allopathy" addresses this by blind studies. IN TRIALS, Two groups of patients are treated, one with the drug in question and one with only a pill which is inert. Neither group knows whether they are getting the drug or the placebo. So each group has an equal level of surety that they are getting the drug. Hence, the placebo effect is equal in both the groups. So now, if any effect is noted in the group being given the drug has to be the objective effect of that drug (This follows very logically).
When similar trials are done with homeopathy, it has not significantly stood out against a placebo and hence not proof of any specific effect beyond that of a placebo.
This blind study is taken a step further by making them DOUBLE blind studies. This is because, if a doctor is giving a drug to a patient, he believes in it and he/she MAY SUBJECTIVELY see an improvement where there may not be any. This is taken care of in trials by not even allowing the attending doctor know whether he/she the patient he is treating is on the drug or the placebo. So again, even the doctor has equal level of surety of administering the actual drug for both the groups of patients. Hence any effect seen now is clearly because of the drug and not a placebo effect.
Here again, homeopathy has failed to give any results which were statistically more significant than what we call as an observer bias.

By Dr. Harshit (not verified) on 25 Aug 2011 #permalink

"Allopathic" and homeopathic medicines are both human discoveries and as such are not infallible. "Allopathy" recognizes this fact and thus questions its own medicines and its own knowledge to search for better and more accurate FACTS and medicines. Thus it has refined and become more accurate than it previously was and till today continues to dissect itself to see where it is going wrong. Hence the large, multilevel trials before a drug is released into the market and then post marketing surveillance is continuously done to monitor any unforseen developments. I don't see homeopathy doing this at all. There seems to be an almost arrogant assertion that a human construct is infallible and is as sound now as it was 300 hundred years back; DESPITE the fact that it fails to prove its efficacy under rigorous scientific scrutiny and is not supported by evidence from other scientific disciplines.
"Water has memory" might have been believable 300 hundred years back but not anymore. It neither has a VERIFIABLE effect independent from chance or placebo (it fails trials designed to rule these out) nor is it supported by any hard scientific facts. The argument to believe is based on anecdotal "evidence" (which cannot rule out chance, un-accounted for effects and placebo) and "so many people practice it hence it must be true" (so was bloodletting and human sacrifice at one point in time).

By Dr. Harshit (not verified) on 26 Aug 2011 #permalink

Lastly, I'd like to clarify some weird assertions about "Allopathy" made by homeopaths and infact ALL other complementary medicine practices. The assertion is that their respective form of medicine focuses on "Natural" remedies where as "Allopathy" does not.
The truth is, "Allopathy" is not concerned with whether the medicine is "natural" or "synthetic" or "ethnic" or "trditional" or "complementary" or any categorizations of this nature. We "Allopaths" are concerned only with whether it WORKS or not. Atropine (from Atropa belladonna or the deadly nightshade plant), Digitalis (from the foxglove plant), Artemisinin (from a chinese plant), Quinine (from the cinchona tree), Fish oils, antibiotics (from fungal moulds), Vinca alkaloids (again plant based), Insulin (from pigs and now from bacteria), FSH (from urine of menopausal women) are but a few of the many drugs used in "Allopathy" which are of natural origin. They do have side effects as does anything with an effect; EVEN WATER. Belladonna is a homeopathic drug but it is probably used for the opposite reason for which we use it in "Allopathy". Quinine was used by native americans. "Allopathy" uses these drugs because they work. If Homeopathy can prove that its drugs work, "Allopathy" has no problem in accepting and using them because we only care if it works or not. We don't care about the source or origin. We don't use neem compounds to cure chicken pox because it has not shown an observable beneficial effect.
As far as the "natural is better" argument goes, many of the natural substances are actually poisons which the plant or animal has developed to protect itself. We have found a medicinal dose for it at the right does and for the appropriate illness. Nevertheless, they're still poisons. Secondly, it was proven more than 100 years ago that there is no difference between compounds produced by "Natural" sources and those same compounds produced in the laboratory. This has formed the fundamental basis upon which the great strides in biology, biochemistry, molecular biology, genetics, paleonatology, proteomics and physiology have been made. We have known for more than a century now that there is no such thing as a "life force" and life functions on the same principles of physics and chemistry which governs the inanimate world. Life has its inherent nature because of the sophistication of its organization to allow it to exist as it does within the framework of the inviolable laws of physics and chemistry. So where does "natural" vs "synthetic" come in?
To conclude, all the debunkers of modern medicine upon whose shoulders you stand with a much higher life expectancy and less debility than your ancestors, you want to prove a point, prove it on the basis of sound principles upon which REALITY is based. Not on unverifiable claims and anecdotes which don't have all their bases covered. Speak that which stands even in the gale of scrutiny and we shall believe you, accept you and implement your ideas.

By Dr. Harshit (not verified) on 26 Aug 2011 #permalink

Yes that's pretty much what I said in my comments. I practice real medicine and the purpose of putting allopathy in quotes is to point out that it is a stupid term which homeopaths use to describe real medicine. Surely you don't think that a person who practices medicine would know that it is not called "allopathy" by anyone else but homeopaths. Maybe you are the one who is lost after all.
AND, I wouldn't have commented on a 2 year old thread if I hadn't seen that the last comment was only a couple of months old.
Maybe you should stop trying to insult and get on with talking stuff that shows you know what you are talking about.

By Dr. Harshit (not verified) on 26 Aug 2011 #permalink

Yes that's pretty much what I said in my comments. I practice real medicine [...]

Could you just get to the angle that you're going to try to sell, please?

To add to what Narad said, please do it on the more recent thread.

Dr. Harshit, I am sorry I offended you by asking why you posted on a two year old thread. In the future you should actually read the article you find on Google and take note of its date (April 9, 2009). Then go to the home page and see what is under discussion. Do not rely on the last few comments.

This was advice I encountered when I first got online with a phone modem over ten years ago. It still applies today.

If you read some of the recent comments, they were put there by people pushing an agenda on a old thread with the hope no one would see it. That way they can claim "victory!" because it scrolled off of the "Recent Comments" list before it could be seen.

It is considered bad form to bring an old thread out of the past (hence the term "Necromancer"). Plus, it works better if you lurk around a blog for a bit before you start commenting. That way you do not start off on the wrong foot.

And it might help if you used the search box on the upper left hand corner of this page. If you had searched for the word "allopathy" you would have been well aware of what the author of this blog and his readers think of the term. You can start by reading this article:

This borders on a not-pology. Personally, I find it hard to believe that Dr. Zilberberg was "blissfully unaware" of the negative connotations of the term "allopathic" physicians given how often I've now seen her use the term while castigating SBM for "arrogance" and other shortcomings. Personally, I'd suggest that if she is so unaware of the negative connotation of the term, she is currently too uninformed to be blogging about such topics and should refrain from doing so anymore, at least until she educates herself a bit more on the basics of the tactics and arguments of CAM advocates used to distort evidence and science. Of course, if you check out the link she uses to define allopathy, I fail to see how Steve and my criticism of her for using the term "allopathic physicians" wasn't spot on.

@Chris: I'm a little new to the blog sphere so I hope my little excursion upon an old thread won't be taken too strongly. As far as the term "Allopathy" goes, I pretty much hate it myself and was just being sarcastic about the term as some people use it. I wasn't aware of how very strongly others felt about it too. I shall be more aware of the author's viewpoints before commenting any further.
Oh yeah, and the necromancer part wasn't offensive.

@Narad: the angle I was trying to sell was in the 4 rather long comments which I had posted before that.

By Dr. Harshit (not verified) on 27 Aug 2011 #permalink

@ Dr. Harshit: Why not come over to a newer article ("Yet another bad day for the anti-vaccine movement"-August 26, 2011); Chris, Narad and I are having some lively discussions.