From the Center for American Progress, via Climate Progress:
and from the comments to Joe Romm's post:
Mark Shapiro says:
August 18, 2009 at 11:01 am. . . "It would be great if the skeptics were right!"
That's a near-perfect rejoinder whether debating a skeptic or just chatting with friends. Followed with:
"Then the only value of clean, safe renewable energy would be clean air, better health, stronger national security, and conserving our natural heritage.
(I'm easing back into real blogging after a few weeks of vacation followed by intense real work.)
- Log in to post comments
More like this
A letter in Climatic Change looking at the life-cycle greenhouse warming potential of natural gas raised a lot of hackles a little while back. If, as the authors posit, replacing coal and oil combustion with gas-fired turbines could actually accelerate global warming rather than slow it down, then…
I had a great pleasure recently to be able to interview Senator - and now Democratic Presidential candidate - John Edwards for my blog. The interview was conducted by e-mail last week.
As I am at work and unable to moderate comments, the comment section is closed on this post, but will be open…
The last one of these was in mid-June, so we're picking up all the summer stories of scientific mayhem in the Trump era. The last couple of months have seemed especially apocalyptic, with Nazis marching in the streets and nuclear war suddenly not so distant a possibility. But along with those…
Logging the Onset of The Bottleneck YearsThis weekly posting is brought to you courtesy of H. E. Taylor. Happy reading, I hope you enjoy this week's Global Warming news roundup
skip to bottom Another week of Global Warming News Information is not Knowledge...Knowledge is notWisdomNovember 20,…
Ah, but which 'skeptics' do we wish were right? The ones that say it's not happening, the ones that say it is but that we've had nothing to do with it, the ones that say it is happening, but that it's a good thing, or the ones that claim, with entirely straight faces (figuratively speaking) ALL THREE?