Bringing phytosaurs back to life

i-3d2a5d7c6aacb530ff7af7cd9bfd0a54-phytosaurheads.jpg


The reconstructions of Brachysuchus and Rhytiodon compared. From Case 1931.


In the winter of 1931, University of Michigan paleontologist E.C. Case commissioned artist Carleton W. Angell to bring two phytosaurs to life. Even though phytosaurs as a group were still poorly defined, Case recognized that there seemed to be at least two morphotypes represented by different skull reconstruction. According to Case's summary, Rhytiodon (now called Rutiodon) represented a more lightly-built form that probably fed upon fish, while the more massive Brachysuchus (now often called Angistorhinus) appeared to have jaws better suited to taking down larger, armored prey. The reconstructions he commissioned from Angell (made 1/3 of the size of the actual fossils) were meant to reflect this difference, although he did suspect that other forms would represent intermediate stages between the gracile Rhytiodon and robus Brachysuchus.

i-26db375714c563bb261547fbebcb7fc1-brachysuchushead.jpg


The skull and jaws of Brachysuchus. From Case 1930.


These reconstructions were made possible by the discovery of the lower jaw and skull of Brachysuchus during the previous two years. In 1930, Case described the lower jaw of Brachysuchus found not far from where the skull was recovered, and they fit well enough that there was little question that they were from the same species (if not the same individual).

For those of you not familiar with what a phytosaurs, they were a group of archosaurs that shared a common ancestor with crocodiles, but they developed a crocodile-like body form earlier than true crocodylians did (which did not appear until the Jurassic). The heyday of the phytosaurs was the Triassic, but ultimately they declined and disappeared by the end of the period. The easiest way to tell them apart from crocodylians if you see their remains in a museum, though, is to look where their nostrils are; rather than being on the tips of their snouts, their nostrils were further back, sometimes almost right over their eyes.

References;

Case, E.C. (1930) "On the Lower Jaw of Brachysuchus megalodon." Contributions From the Museum of Paleontology, Vol. 3 (8), pp. 155-161

Case, E.C. (1931) "Life Model of the Heads of Two Types of Phytosaurs." Contributions From the Museum of Paleontology, Vol. 3 (10), pp. 183-185

More like this

A female gharial (Gavialis gangeticus). Ever since Baryonyx walkeri was announced to the scientific community in 1986, spinosaurid dinosaurs have often been compared to crocodylians (at least as far as the construction of their skulls are concerned), the similarity going so far as to result in one…
The incomplete skull of Nicrosaurus (formerly "Belodon"), one of the earliest-recognized phytosaurs. It is missing teeth and it did not have an extended downward extension of the palate (the outline that extends below the upper jaw marked by the dotted line) like modern crocodiles. From A guide to…
One of the first things I was ever told about what makes reptiles different from mammals was that reptile teeth were the same all throughout their jaws (called a homodont condition) and that mammal teeth were different throughout their jaws (called a heterodont condition). The fact that mammals had…
Camarasaurus is an unappreciated sauropod. It wasn't the heaviest or longest of the earth-shaking dinosaurs, but the blunted skull and large teeth of the Jurassic sauropod indicate that it had a different lifestyle than the more famous Diplodocus and Apatosaurus. In 1920, paleontologists at the…

Very interesting. By chance, do you have any plans for covering other archosaur groups like the Pholidosaurs &c.?