The curious tale of the Dimetrodon sail

i-d137e637465183fe268a375f54242caa-dimetrodon1.jpg


A mount of Dimetrodon at the AMNH. From the Bulletin of the AMNH.


The predatory pelycosaur Dimetrodon has always been a favorite of mine. Though not a dinosaur it has an appearance as bizarre as any dinosaur you care to name, and the function of the huge sail on its back is remains an enigma. What could such an impressive structure be used for?

Slight differences in the bony back struts of a similar animal that inhabited the same habitat as Dimetrodon provided paleontologist E.D. Cope with a clue. Where Dimetrodon was a large apex predator "Naosaurus" appeared to be a more peaceful creature. Today we know that "Naosaurus" was a chimera, the head of a Dimetrodon attached to the body of the sail-backed herbivore Edaphosaurus, but this was not initially apparent. The bodies of the two animals were similar but since "Naosaurus" lacked a skull it was difficult to be sure what its habits were. In 1908 paleontologist E.C. Case speculated on the habits of "Naosaurus" (attributing to it a more Edaphosaurus-like skull) in Popular Science;

In a recent restoration of Naosaurus it has been given the skull of the fiercely carnivorous Dimetrodon, the general similarity of the forms seemed to warrant this, but recent discoveries have made it probable that Naosaurus was not an eater of flesh, but a peaceful, sluggish eater of shell fish and perhaps of vegetation. This animal has perhaps the most wonderful dentition of any known animal the incisor teeth are sharp and chisel-shaped, such as might be useful in cutting strong vegetation; behind these are five sharp triangular cutting teeth, not unlike the sectorial teeth of such flesh eaters as the tiger and lion; behind these simple cones, such as would be useful in holding a struggling victim.

i-825aa917767ea2c52eec1f03ce593aad-img10.jpg


"Naosaurus" as envisioned by Charles R. Knight. Note the transverse struts on the sail spines indicative of Edaphosaurus.


This would make Dimetrodon the dominating carnivore of the time and "Naosaurus" an omnivore, but this only made the puzzle of the sails more complex. Why should animals with different habits share the same structure? Multiple explanations had been proposed. The most abused notion was Cope's suggestion that the term "sail" was especially apt, i.e. that these animals were using these structures just like a boat sail.

In 1886 Cope wrote a short note on "The Long-Spined Theromorpha of the Permian Epoch" for the American Naturalist. Of the sail on Dimetrodon Cope wrote;

The utility [of the sail] is difficult to imagine. Unless the animal had aquatic habits and swam on its back, the crest or fin must have been in the way of active movements.

The sail of "Naosaurus", however, had an important difference;

There the spines are not quite so elevated as in the [Dimetrodon], but they are more robust, and have transverse processes or branches which resemble the yardarms of a ship's mast. ... The animal must have presented an extraordinary appearance. Perhaps its dorsal armature resembled the branches of shrubs then, as they do now, and served to conceal them in a brushy or wooded region. Or, more probably, the yardarms were connected by membrane with the neural spine or mast, thus serving the animal as a sail with which he navigated the waters of the Permian lakes.

This remained a popular notion (it was featured in a 1897 article on "Strange Creatures of the Past" in The Century, among some other ideas) but it seems to have been a target of more ridicule than careful consideration. The idea that the sails provided some kind of camouflage was more reasonable, but it seemed strange that a billboard should serve as a feature that would conceal already-large animals.

Cope's hypotheses had failed, but perhaps there was another explanation. Case wondered if the sails could be the result of a once-useful structure outgrowing its usefulness, the product of some kind of "evolutionary inertia";

Such a development seems to have occurred once and again in the history of the world, and the most bizarre types of life owe something of their condition, at least, to this principle. The late Professor Beecher, of Yale, has shown that there is a decided tendency, both in plants and in animals, for a species that is nearing the point of its extinction to develop a spiny or horny habit, covering itself with all sorts of excrescences, seemingly in an unregulated effort to find some condition which will prolong its existence. It is certain that these reptiles, dominant as they were, were rapidly completing their allotted span and as the end approached the spines grew ever heavier and heavier, until it seems plausible to suggest that they became at least a great drain on the animal's powers of nutrition and hastened in no slight degree the end.

It may be unusual to read this sort of language used in considerations of evolution, but Case was working at a time when non-Darwinian evolutionary mechanisms were popular in paleontology. (See yesterday's post about orthogenesis and horses.) It was not strange to think that not only might evolution be directional, but lineages might have a kind of natural timer that determined "their allotted span." In this way lineages were treated like individuals, having a "life" from birth (origin of a new group) to death (extinction). It was as if Dimetrodon and its kind were desperately trying to find some new adaptation to stave off the end.

(Another example of this idea was the saber-toothed cat Smilodon, which some researchers thought became extinct due to overdevelopment of their canines that prevented them from closing their mouths. I can recall hearing this idea in a children's documentary on ancient mammals as late as the 1980's.)

These sorts of notions were cast out when the modern evolutionary synthesis coalesced in the mid-20th century, but the sails of Dimetrodon, Edaphosaurus, and similarly-endowed creatures from other groups still puzzle paleontologists. Thermoregulation and sexual selection are most often considered to have played a role in the origin of these structures but since we cannot directly observe the physiology or behavior of these animals it is difficult to be sure. It is not a mystery that should be shelved, however. Ornate sails have independently evolved so many times in the course of vertebrate evolution that questions about their origins and functions are still worthy of consideration.

Categories

More like this

Over the course of evolutionary history there have been a number of animals that have sported elongated neural spines, the structures sometimes aiding in the support of a hump (as in bison) and other times as the framework for a great sail (as in Spinosaurus). Of the group of "sail-backed" and "…
Last week I spent some time writing about Dimetrodon and the various functions paleontologists ascribed to its sail (from a literal sail to a sign of coming extinction). It can be easy to forget that no two sails were exactly alike, though, and paleo-artist Michael Skrepnick (see my interview with…
Today's photo is of the famous sail-backed pelycosaur Edaphosaurus from the Permian red beds of Texas. As if its sail wasn't enough to puzzle paleontologists, the fact that the neural spines bear "cross bars" further adds to the mystery (I know of no other animal that has exhibited such a feature…
A very unusual reconstruction of Dimetrodon from the textbook Geology, based on a reconstruction by E.C. Case. Dimetrodon and other sail-backed creatures were once considered to have become too "spiny" to survive.According to the old, if inaccurate, aphorism ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny, or the…

Is there any possibility the sails were flexible? It looks like a bone protrusion of the spine, so not much if that's the case, but could it be jointed or made of some more flexible material that fossilized into one piece?

I remember the Dimetrodon segment in the Walking With... series that showed Dimetrodon huddling in a blizzard. I don't know how accurate that was but it got me wondering. If they did survive cold winters I'd think the sail would be susceptible to frostbite. Since sails seemed to be an adaptation that recurred, it must have been quite useful. Any ideas on how sails kept warm during winter?

The sails are held up by elongate neural spines, and there were no joints. It was once thought that the sails may have been sexually dimorphic, and that the female of Dimetrodon was Sphenacodon, but seeing as the two never occured together (and, if fact, operated in different strata) doesn't give much credence to the idea. Also, "pelycosauria" is a paraphyletic term now. :-(

The sails probably had a display or thermoregulatory function (or both). I think it's interesting that Dimetrodon and Edaphosaurus lived together, a carnivore and a herbivore, and both developed sails. This dynamic would repeat in the Cretaceous with Spinosaurus and Ouranosaurus.

I find it hard to believe the sails of Dimetrodon and Edaphosaurus served a purely utilitarian purpose as a radiator (for example, closely related pelycosaurs didn't have them.) I prefer Bakker's theory of the sail as a sexual advertising device: flamboyant structures on an animal's body almost always serve a sexual purpose. The mystery of why unrelated animal lineages have developed this feature, which isn't found in the natural world today, is also confounding. The saber-toothed morphology is like the sail, being re-developed by unrelated creatures repeatedly, but not found in the modern world at all.

By Raymond Minton (not verified) on 18 Mar 2009 #permalink