So Now the Majority of Americans Are Liberals?

Well, that's what Dan Balz of the Washington Post seems to think. I was reading this article about the YearlyKos convention by Balz, and he kept referring to the positions the participants held as "doctrinaire" and "liberal." Now, and I say this as someone who is proud to call himself a liberal, my one concern with the whole Kos phenomenon and the appointment of Kos-the site and the author-as the standard bearer of the Democratic Party is that it's not liberal enough. So why does Balz think the Kossites are "doctrinaire liberals" and engage in "liberal attacks?"

John Aravosis sums up the five 'liberal doctrines' that Balz describes:

1. They don't like Bush.

2. They're upset about the Iraq war.

3. They bash Republicans.

4. They don't like the fact that the White House jeopardized national security by outing a CIA agent.

5. They believe that the mainstream media isn't doing its job.

Aravosis adds that another reporter told him that the attendees' desire to have Rumsfeld replaced is a mark of liberalism. So now, George Bush Sr., who actually tried to get Rumsfeld replaced, is a liberal too?

Take a good look at the five points above. With maybe the exception of #3 (which is what politically active Democrats of all stripes are supposed to do), each of those positions is held by either a plurality or a majority of Americans. Consequently, we are to conclude that the majority of Americans are liberals.

I would be thrilled if this were the case, but I don't think that it's so (although I do think the number of people who lean liberal combined with actual liberals is much higher than is commonly thought).

But this isn't just about shoddy language. By describing the attendees as doctrinaire liberals, Balz and the rest of the celebrity media miss the entire point of the left-of-center blogosphere. If my experience is any indication, a lot of Democratic/progressive bloggers turned to the internet because it was the only place left to go. I still think the story, and more importantly, the question is will the Democratic Party listen to its alienated base?

Tags

More like this

Or socialist. Or maybe just Swedish. By way of Ezra Klein, I came across these polling data collected by Ruy Teixeira: If you hold both of these views (and arguably, even just one), you are an economic liberal. Not a moderate, but a liberal. I realize many people don't want to be called…
Apparently, Matt Stoller, like the Mad Biologist, wants to hear a dog whistle from Obama too (italics mine): 74% of young caucus goers self-identified as Democrats, and 73% self-identified is liberals. Yeah, that's some post-partisan and post-ideological generation coming through the ranks. This is…
A follow-up on last week's repost (originally from April 06, 2005)... ----------------------------------------------- I've been wavering in how to call the Right Wing. When I say "conservatives" I get attacked for equating conservatism with GOP (with implication that conservatism is good but GOP…
A follow-up on last night's repost (originally from April 06, 2005)... ----------------------------------------------- I've been wavering in how to call the Right Wing. When I say "conservatives" I get attacked for equating conservatism with GOP (with implication that conservatism is good but GOP…

LOL Well it is not like Kos or Aravosis are /cough/ liberals.

They are operatives.

It would be best if Balz, a very middling reporter *and* the Bully Boys of the BlogNetteries did not try to define political appellations as relates to political philosophy.

Talk about people talking past each oyther, the Balzes and the Koses..