The Real Impetus Behind the "Sanctity of Marriage" Canard

The Mel Gibson anti-Semitic tirade is turning into quite the teachable moment. I've never understood the 'sanctity of marriage arguments.' To me, they always sounded analogous to the arguments against interracial marriage: underneath it all was only squalid and ugly hate. Here's what Gibson said about homosexuality in 1992 (it's below the fold because it's pretty vile):

Heartthrob actor Mel Gibson, asked by one of Spain's leading magazines what he thinks of homosexuals, launched into a tirade against gay men.

"They take it up the ass," Gibson told El Pais as he got out of his chair, bent over and pointed to his butt. "This is only for taking a shit," he said.

Reminded by the interviewer, Koro Castellano, that he worked with gays while studying at the School of Dramatic Arts, Gibson added: "They were good people, kind, I like them. But their thing is not my thing."

Castellano said, "But you were obsessed with the thought that if you were an actor, people would confuse you with one of them."

"Yes," Gibson admitted, "but I did it. I became an actor despite that. But with this look, who's going to think I'm gay? It would be hard to take me for someone like that.

"Do I sound like a homosexual?" he asked. "Do I talk like them? Do I move like them?

"What happens is when you're an actor, they stick that label on you," Gibson said. "I go from playing rugby one week to taking dance classes in black leotards the next. Many of the girls that I met in school took it for granted that I was gay."

But really, the opposition to gay marriage has to do with 'the sanctity of marriage.'

Gibson certainly does seem to have a lot of 'issues' here. What has always struck me about much of the anti-gay movement is the graphic obsession with particular sexual acts between consenting adults. Don't like it? Then don't do it. And for the love of the Intelligent Designer, just stop thinking about it so much if it really does bother you. That's really, erm, odd...

More like this

I'm sure everyone knows by now that Mel Gibson was arrested for drunk driving on Friday. When he was arrested, he was apparently quite belligerant and ranted at the officers arresting him, threatening them and hurling anti-semitic slurs. Even more important, the LA Times is reporting that the LA…
Last week, I left a comment at the ADF's blog in response to a post by Jordan Lorence about judicial activism that was apparently written in response to me (go here, scroll down to my first comment). My comment said: Simple yes or no question: was Loving v Virginia correctly decided or was it "…
Dale Carpenter has an excellent essay on the response to the Foley scandal from the anti-gay right. I think he correctly highlights what this episode tells us about the response of the religious right. I'll post a long excerpt below the fold. William Eskridge, a Yale law professor, has written that…
While we're talking about anti-gay bigotry and the religious right, how about this oldie but goodie from Pat Robertson. Last summer, he declared that gays are responsible for no-fault divorce and abortions: ROBERTSON: I had interviewed a lady who was a sociologist who says "I am a lesbian," but she…

Well, that rant of Mel's could have been worse. He only said that it was unnatural, gross, that he doesn't understand it, and it bothers him immensely to be mistaken for being gay.

At least he didn't say he hated them all and they should all be killed, or that they were responsible for all the wars in the world.

Re: the "This is only for taking a shit" thing - What about heterosexual couples who do anal? Or maybe men's anuses are only for poopin', but women's anuses are multi-function.