For Heaven's Sake Eat Something!

More than a few blogs have discussed the kerfuffle over the Australian fashion designer who had a runway show with women who were not emaciated. Not much to add, but I came across this survey of 100 models at Fashion Week. What shocked me weren't the eating habits, but their ages:

14-15 . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
16-17 . . . . . . . . . . . 26

18-19 . . . . . . . . . . . 41
20-21 . . . . . . . . . . .24
Over 22 . . . . . . . . . . 4

That's right, 31% were younger than 18 (paging John Derbyshire...). Only 4% were over 21. What's even worse than the emaciation fetish (although that's pretty dreadful), is the obsession with age. Twenty-two isn't 'too old.' And based on no evidence whatsoever other than my personal experience, I think this 'reverse ageism' affects women far more than men: few think a man in his 30s is 'old', but far more think a women in her 30s is old.

The only saving grace is that the number one downside to being a model was "dirty old men"...

More like this

I suggested below that though on average whites did not move toward the Democrats, regionally there might be differences. I inferred this from the fact that areas where blacks are thin on the ground in the South it looks as if John McCain did better than George W. Bush in 2004. So I compared the…
One of the major problems in most societies, subject to "great sorts" of various kinds, is the fact that people observe correlations of attitudes & beliefs, and infer from those necessary relations. For example, if one of the first things that someone finds out about me is that I am an atheist…
Since I asked regular readers to fill out a survey, I've received over 300 responses. My own experience with these surveys is that about 50% of the total responses come within 24 hours. Next weekend I'll put up the .csv file with all the data, and present some of my analyses as well. But below…
There are nearly 500 complete responses to the survey from last week. Here's a CSV file of the results. Below the fold are the frequencies as well as N's. I might report some trends in the data, but a lot of it is predictable. People who only read ScienceBlogs GNXP are way more liberal than those…

Right. They look like children because they *are* children, a huge number of them being way too young to marry in any civilized country.

According to the German news magazine "Der Spiegel" organizers of the Madrid fashion week "Pasarela Cibeles" only hired models with a BMI > 18 due to a 1999 recommendation of the Spanish parliment to prevent young girls from wrong role models (please note that they needed seven years for this action). BMI < 16 is referred to as bullemia or annorexia. Thus, BMI = 18 (56 kg at 1.75 m) does not appear too healthy either.
ou will find the article here:
http://www.spiegel.de/panorama/0,1518,436029,00.html

According to the German news magazine "Der Spiegel" organizers of the Madrid fashion week "Pasarela Cibeles" only hired models with a BMI over 18 due to a 1999 recommendation of the Spanish parliment to prevent young girls from wrong role models (please note that they needed seven years for this action). BMI lower then 16 is referred to as bullemia or annorexia. Thus, a BMI of 18 (56 kg at 1.75 m) does not appear too healthy either.
ou will find the article here:
http://www.spiegel.de/panorama/0,1518,436029,00.html

I should have previewed my comment before posting. Unfortunately, one can not use bigger and smaller signs because they are needed for XML.