What should be the cover story of a major news magazine: the resurgence of the Taliban, or a biography of photographer Annie Leibowitz? Well, if you're the powers that be at Newsweek, you decide that the resurgence of the Taliban is more important, except for U.S. readers. We get Leibowitz.
Gutless.
A completely unrelated aside: Our Benevolent Seed Overlords want a picture of the Mad Biologist for their own nefarious purposes. So I ask you: what do you think a Mad Biologist would look like? Click here to offer your opinions.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
And one of my favorite liberal wonks was wearing glasses while doing so. That has to hurt. Seriously, Waldman did a brilliant thing: he shifted the discussion onto his terms. Instead of the storyline being "liberals are mean to Bill O'Loofa O'Reilly", it became "why can't conservatives respond…
Fellow ScienceBlogling Chris Mooney comped me a copy of the second edition of his book, The Republican War on Science, and I have finally managed to get around to writing a review of it. Here's the short version: buy this book.
It details exactly what the Bush Administration has done to U.S.…
Our Benevolent Seed Overlords want a picture of the Mad Biologist for their own nefarious purposes. So I ask you: what do you think a Mad Biologist would look like? Below are some candidates, but if you have something else in mind, feel free to link to it.
It's a little odd. One of the things…
I think this is the last announcement for the day.
Do yinz know about Seed magazine? No? You're not reading it?
Well, if you subscribe right now you get a totally cool Scienceblogs mug for FREE!
If you're seeing a similar banner at the top of the page, it's clickable and you can go…
Speaking of gutless cowards - does any one else find the new Verizon commericial offensive? You know the one that features the Indian neighbor family, ignorantly referred to as the "Kumar Swami's"??
I really don't care what a what a magazine puts on its cover. What they put inside it is what is important. If their articles inside the articles are a sell out, then rant.
There are other reasons besides cowardess that might motive Newsweek to put the photographer on the cover instead of the war.
1) There are articles about the wars are all over the place. Thus having an article on the war might not always be the best thing to put on the cover to sell the magazine. What interesting article is inside the issue that other magazines don't have? Latin Americans though might not care about this photographer.
2) Could cover literally be an ad for her? On a hunch I skimmed for something she might be wanting to sell. Sure enough she has got a new book out. The books is pricy and mentioned by Newsweek. I can imagine the magazine might be willing to change its cover in exchange for money. Latin Americans, etc. might not be considered likely buyers of the book.
What is the true explanation? I don't know. But whatever it is I am sure the "bottom line" was somehow involved.