OK, it was yesterday, but it's still pretty funny. In response to this post about Answers Research Journal, a peer-reviewed creationist journal, Joshua of The Adventures of Tobasco de Gama writes:
Hmm. Do you have to use the "Blogging About Peer-Reviewed Research" tag/icon when rebutting ARJ articles?
Heh.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Yesterday, I wrote a post about Casey Luskin's misuse of the ResearchBlogging.org "Blogging about Peer-Reviewed Research" icon. Today, Casey removed the icon from his post, and provided an explanation for his actions. I'm glad that he decided to cease his misuse of the icon, but his explanation…
Casey Luskin has a post up over at the Discovery Institute's website that discusses an article that was recently published in PLoS Biology. The post itself is nothing particularly remarkable - Casey takes a paper that says that current hypotheses don't adequately deal with all of the problems of…
Most CogDaily readers are familiar with the little icon we developed to indicate when we were reporting on peer reviewed research. We created it when we began to offer links to news and blog posts, as a way of distinguishing those less "serious" posts from when we were talking about peer-reviewed…
I don't know if you caught it on these two posts, but I have started to add the Blogging on Peer-Reviewed Research Icon whenever I am analyzing a peer-reviewed paper specifically.
These icons were created by bloggers, including Sciblings Dave Munger, Mike Dunford, and John Wilkins, with the intent…
Thanks, Mike. I pretty much live for making snarky comments, so I appreciate the recognition. ;)
(As for the 1-31-07 post, I have to admit with sadness that the image isn't mine. It's just one of those things that swept across the internet seemingly within minutes of the BPD releasing photos of the Deadly Terrorist LED Mooninite last year.)
I think we should submit hoax articles to the hoax journal, with author "pen names" such as:
I.N.O. Goddidit
Noah Sark
Cat S. Troffic-Floods
Izzy N. DeBible
Perhaps ScienceBlogs could host a contest, to come up with possible titles and abstracts.
>:-)
Brilliant article. And a good example at the same time.
very thanks for article