I heard there was some dyspepsia yesterday or something. Maybe links will make you feel better. Science:
Looks Great, Less Nutritious?
Scientists describe 2 new species of fish from area engulfed by oil spill
The wolves of Ethiopia
Other:
Why Isn't Investment Higher?
Our New York Times Op Ed on the Corporate Savings Glut
A False Consensus about Public Opinion on Torture
Media Filters: For Washington Post, Krugman not a reliable source but Wall Street analyst totally impartial
- Log in to post comments
More like this
But I'm sure you already knew that.
The Wall Street Journal is so far behind the curve when it comes to the science of climate change, and so deep in the pockets of the oil industry, that the following is now true: If you are in business or industry, and want to keep track of important news about…
Bryan Walsh of Time lets us know what he thinks of Nisbet's Climate Shift with the title of his post: The Unfair Reception of the Climate Shift Report Shows That Greens Need to Be More Open to New Ideas. He explains why he thinks the reception is unfair in an aside:
So, just to get this straight,…
I've considering canceling my New York Times subscription. Here are the pros and cons. The reasons to keep my subscription:
The NY Times has a really good science section (John Tierney excepted). It's worth supporting that.
Much of there 'straight' reporting is quite good--or at least it's…
This one is worth looking at because it was published as a letter to the editor in an actual newspaper. Or, at least, on the web site.
A little background is in order. First, Dennis Slonka wrote an Op Ed in the Providence Journal telling us that "Climate Science Will Never Be Settled." In it he…
I thought the Mother Jones "Looks Great, Less Nutritious?" was bizarrely out of date. This was common knowledge two or three decades ago! Supermarket tomato sauce tastes infinitely better than supermarket tomatoes, and so on.